Abstract:Background: In epidemiologic investigations of disease outbreaks, multivariable regression techniques with adjustment for confounding can be applied to assess the association between exposure and outcome. Traditionally, logistic regression has been used in analyses of case-control studies to determine the odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. For rare outcomes (incidence of 5% to 10%), an adjusted OR can be used to approximate the risk ratio (RR). However, concern has been raised about using logistic regression to estimate RR because how closely the calculated OR approximates the RR depends largely on the outcome rate. The literature shows that when the incidence of outcomes exceeds 10%, ORs greatly overestimate RRs. Consequently, in addition to logistic regression, other regression methods to accurately estimate adjusted RRs have been explored. One method of interest is Poisson regression with robust standard errors. This generalized linear model estimates RR directly vs logistic regression that determines OR. The purpose of this study was to empirically compare risk estimates obtained from logistic regression and Poisson regression with robust standard errors in terms of effect size and determination of the most likely source in the analysis of a series of simulated single-source disease outbreak scenarios. Methods: We created a prototype dataset to simulate a foodborne outbreak following a public event with 14 food exposures and a 52.0% overall attack rate. Regression methods, including binary logistic regression and Poisson regression with robust standard errors, were applied to analyze the dataset. To further examine how these two models led to different conclusions of the potential outbreak source, a series of 5 additional scenarios with decreasing attack rates were simulated and analyzed using both regression models. Results: For each of the explanatory variables-sex, age, and food types-in both univariable and multivariable models, the ORs obtained from logistic regression were estimated further from 1.0 than their corresponding RRs estimated by Poisson regression with robust standard errors. In the simulated scenarios, the Poisson regression models demonstrated greater consistency in the identification of one food type as the most likely outbreak source. Conclusion: Poisson regression with robust standard errors proved to be a decisive and consistent method to estimate risk associated with a single source in an outbreak when the cohort data collection design was used.

Risk ratios for contagious outcomes

Application of general relative risk models on the analysis of risk factors of epidemic diseases

Effect of homophily and correlation of beliefs on COVID-19 and general infectious disease outbreaks

What'S the Relative Risk? A Method of Correcting the Odds Ratio in Cohort Studies of Common Outcomes

Randomization for the susceptibility effect of an infectious disease intervention

Prevalence odds ratio versus prevalence ratio: choice comes with consequences

Estimates of the reproduction ratio from epidemic surveillance may be biased in spatially structured populations

The impact of clustering binary data on relative risk towards a study of inferential methods

Causal identification of infectious disease intervention effects in a clustered population

Nuances of Cohort Studies and Risk Ratio

Translating Risk Ratios, Baseline Incidence, and Proportions Diseased to Correlations and Chi-Squared Statistics: Simulation Epidemiology

Investigating the Source of a Disease Outbreak Based on Risk Estimation: A Simulation Study Comparing Risk Estimates Obtained From Logistic and Poisson Regression Applied to a Dichotomous Outcome

Risk averse reproduction numbers improve resurgence detection

Estimate Risk Difference and Number Needed to Treat in Survival Analysis.

Odds are the sign is right

The Complex Interplay Between Risk Tolerance and the Spread of Infectious Diseases

Infections are not alike: the effects of covariation between individual susceptibility and transmissibility on epidemic dynamics

Relative risks, the probability of necessity, and attributable fractions

Identification of causal intervention effects under contagion

Why case fatality ratios can be misleading: individual- and population-based mortality estimates and factors influencing them

Approximate Reciprocal Relationship Between Two Cause-Specific Hazard Ratios in COVID-19 Data with Mutually Exclusive Events.