Abstract:Uncertainty in structural loading during launch is a significant concern in the development of spacecraft and launch vehicles. Small variations in launch vehicle and payload mode shapes and their interaction can result in significant variation in system loads. In many cases involving large aerospace systems, it is difficult, not economical, or impossible to perform a system modal test. However, it is still vital to obtain test results that can be compared with analytical predictions to validate models. Instead, the “Building Block Approach” is used in which system components are tested individually. Component models are correlated and updated to agree as best they can with test results. The Space Launch System consists of a number of components that are assembled into a launch vehicle. Finite element models of the components are developed, reduced to Hurty/Craig-Bampton models, and assembled to represent different phases of flight. The only opportunity to obtain modal test data from an assembled Space Launch System will be during the Integrated Modal Test. There is always uncertainty in every model, which flows into uncertainty in predicted system results. Uncertainty quantification is used to determine statistical bounds on prediction accuracy based on model uncertainty. For the Space Launch System, model uncertainty is at the Hurty/Craig-Bampton component level. Uncertainty in the Hurty/Craig-Bampton components is quantified using the hybrid parametric variation approach, which combines parametric and nonparametric uncertainties. Uncertainty in model form is one of the biggest contributors to uncertainty in complex built-up structures. This type of uncertainty cannot be represented by variations in finite element model input parameters and thus cannot be included in a parametric approach. However, model-form uncertainty can be modeled using a nonparametric approach based on the random matrix theory. The hybrid parametric variation method requires the selection of dispersion values for the Hurty/Craig-Bampton fixed-interface eigenvalues and the Hurty/Craig-Bampton stiffness matrices. Component test/analysis frequency error is used to identify fixed-interface eigenvalue dispersions, while test/analysis cross-orthogonality is used to identify stiffness dispersion values. The hybrid parametric variation uncertainty quantification approach is applied to the Space Launch System Integrated Modal Test configuration. Monte Carlo analysis is performed, and statistics are determined for modal correlation metrics, frequency response from Integrated Modal Test shakers to selected accelerometers, as well as other metrics for determining how well target modes are excited and identified. If the predicted uncertainty envelopes future Integrated Modal Test results, then there will be increased confidence in the utility of the component-based hybrid parametric variation uncertainty quantification approach.

Uncertainty quantification for ground vehicle vulnerability simulation

Model Validation Via Uncertainty Propagation and Data Transformations

System-Level Analysis of Module Uncertainty Quantification in the Autonomy Pipeline

SLS Integrated Modal Test Uncertainty Quantification Using the Hybrid Parametric Variation Method

A Kriging-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Fracture Assessment

Nonintrusive Uncertainty Quantification for automotive crash problems with VPS/Pamcrash

Scalable Approach to Uncertainty Quantification and Robust Design of Interconnected Dynamical Systems

Applying Uncertainty Quantification to Structural Systems: Parameter Reduction for Evaluating Model Complexity

A flexible uncertainty quantification method for linearly coupled multi-physics systems.

Towards Improving the Predictive Capability of Computer Simulations by Integrating Inverse Uncertainty Quantification and Quantitative Validation with Bayesian Hypothesis Testing

Hybrid Bayesian Solution to Nasa Langley Research Center Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

An Uncertainty Quantification Method for Inexact Simulation Models

Quantitative Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber Security for Distribution Automation Systems

Hierarchical multiscale quantification of material uncertainty

A Comprehensive Survey of Inverse Uncertainty Quantification of Physical Model Parameters in Nuclear System Thermal-Hydraulics Codes

Vulnerability Assessment of a Multistate Component for IEMI Based on a Bayesian Method

A model-driven approach for vulnerability evaluation of modern physical protection systems

Event-Triggering and Quantized Sliding Mode Control of UMV Systems Under DoS Attack

Quantitative System-Level Security Verification of the IoV Infrastructure

Combined Bayesian and error assessment-based model calibration method for vehicle under-belly blast with uncertainty

Uncertainty Quantification of Mode Shape Variation Utilizing Multi-Level Multi-Response Gaussian Process