Abstract:Uncertainty in structural loading during launch is a significant concern in the development of spacecraft and launch vehicles. Small variations in launch vehicle and payload mode shapes and their interaction can result in significant variation in system loads. In many cases involving large aerospace systems, it is difficult, not economical, or impossible to perform a system modal test. However, it is still vital to obtain test results that can be compared with analytical predictions to validate models. Instead, the “Building Block Approach” is used in which system components are tested individually. Component models are correlated and updated to agree as best they can with test results. The Space Launch System consists of a number of components that are assembled into a launch vehicle. Finite element models of the components are developed, reduced to Hurty/Craig-Bampton models, and assembled to represent different phases of flight. The only opportunity to obtain modal test data from an assembled Space Launch System will be during the Integrated Modal Test. There is always uncertainty in every model, which flows into uncertainty in predicted system results. Uncertainty quantification is used to determine statistical bounds on prediction accuracy based on model uncertainty. For the Space Launch System, model uncertainty is at the Hurty/Craig-Bampton component level. Uncertainty in the Hurty/Craig-Bampton components is quantified using the hybrid parametric variation approach, which combines parametric and nonparametric uncertainties. Uncertainty in model form is one of the biggest contributors to uncertainty in complex built-up structures. This type of uncertainty cannot be represented by variations in finite element model input parameters and thus cannot be included in a parametric approach. However, model-form uncertainty can be modeled using a nonparametric approach based on the random matrix theory. The hybrid parametric variation method requires the selection of dispersion values for the Hurty/Craig-Bampton fixed-interface eigenvalues and the Hurty/Craig-Bampton stiffness matrices. Component test/analysis frequency error is used to identify fixed-interface eigenvalue dispersions, while test/analysis cross-orthogonality is used to identify stiffness dispersion values. The hybrid parametric variation uncertainty quantification approach is applied to the Space Launch System Integrated Modal Test configuration. Monte Carlo analysis is performed, and statistics are determined for modal correlation metrics, frequency response from Integrated Modal Test shakers to selected accelerometers, as well as other metrics for determining how well target modes are excited and identified. If the predicted uncertainty envelopes future Integrated Modal Test results, then there will be increased confidence in the utility of the component-based hybrid parametric variation uncertainty quantification approach.

Hybrid Bayesian Solution to Nasa Langley Research Center Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

A Surrogate Modelling Approach Based on Nonlinear Dimension Reduction for Uncertainty Quantification in Groundwater Flow Models

Bayesian probabilistic propagation of hybrid uncertainties: Estimation of response expectation function, its variable importance and bounds

A Nonparametric Bayesian Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Stochastic Simulation

A Distributionally Robust Optimization Approach to the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

Combining Bayesian Active Learning and Conditional Gaussian Process Simulation for Propagating Mixed Uncertainties through Expensive Computer Simulators

Bayesian Surrogate Analysis and Uncertainty Propagation

Collaborative and Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for bounding variances and probabilities under hybrid uncertainties

Model calibration via distributionally robust optimization: On the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

Hybrid uncertainty propagation based on multi-fidelity surrogate model

Heterogeneous uncertainty quantification using Bayesian inference for simulation-based design optimization

Towards Improving the Predictive Capability of Computer Simulations by Integrating Inverse Uncertainty Quantification and Quantitative Validation with Bayesian Hypothesis Testing

An Efficient Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification Approach with Application to K-Ω-γ Transition Modeling

Adaptive Multi-index Collocation for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis

A two-step surrogate method for sequential uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional inverse problems

Enhanced Gaussian-mixture-model-based nonlinear probabilistic uncertainty propagation using Gaussian splitting approach

MULTI-FIDELITY MODELING OF PROBABILISTIC AERODYNAMIC DATABASES FOR USE IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

Advanced methodology for uncertainty propagation in computer experiments with large number of inputs

Evaluating Two Sparse Grid Surrogates and Two Adaptation Criteria for Groundwater Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification

SLS Integrated Modal Test Uncertainty Quantification Using the Hybrid Parametric Variation Method

DiffHybrid-UQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Differentiable Hybrid Neural Modeling