Abstract:Background Estimating the disease prevalence and test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for two dependent screening tests when the status of individuals who are negative on both tests is unverified represents a considerable challenge, as the disease rates for individuals negative on both tests are not identifiable without additional assumptions. Methods This article presents a unified framework for handling this non-identifiability problem using two-step hierarchical informative prior on the sensitivities by two-stage Bayesian modeling with the characterized by joint testing strategies based on the inherent attribute of screening/diagnostic tests. We assign a diffuse and less risky two-step hierarchical informative uniform prior to the sensitivities while assigning a uniform (0,1) prior distribution to the specificities and prevalence. Strategies for model evaluation, general global evaluations, and individual cell checking are presented. Simulations are conducted under various scenarios to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Applications to real data are also presented to illustrate the potential impact and benefit of the proposed method. Results Our results indicate that when the priors of sensitivities are assigned as appropriate two-step hierarchical informative priors, or even in the absence of the priors for the specificities and prevalence, the parameters involved in this study can still be estimated well. The advantages and limitations of this method in solving such problems are discussed and compared with other two-stage methods. Conclusions We developed a two-stage Bayesian method for two dependent dichotomous screening tests with unverified individuals who are negative on both tests, and addressed the ad hoc model evaluation and checking procedures. The method can be understood easily and used conveniently by non-statisticians.

Exact interval estimation for three parameters subject to false positive misclassification

Exact interval estimation for the linear combination of binomial proportions

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions

Optimal False Discovery Rate Control for Large Scale Multiple Testing with Auxiliary Information

Fiducial Inference in the Classical Errors-in-variables Model

An Improved Score Interval with A Modified Midpoint for A Binomial Proportion

Non-differential misclassification of outcome under (near)-perfect specificity: a simulation study

A Two-Stage Bayesian Method for Estimating Accuracy and Disease Prevalence for Two Dependent Dichotomous Screening Tests when the Status of Individuals Who Are Negative on Both Tests is Unverified

Exact Confidence Intervals for Linear Combinations of Multinomial Probabilities

Statistical inference on mixing proportion

Interval Estimation for the Difference in Paired Areas under the ROC Curves in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test

Approximate confidence interval construction for risk difference under inverse sampling

Conditional Confidence Intervals for the True Classification Error

Interval estimation, point estimation, and null hypothesis significance testing calibrated by an estimated posterior probability of the null hypothesis

Comparing the Accuracy of Screening Tests with Verification of Disease Status Restricted to Test Positives

An Interval Estimation of Unknown Parameter P in Negative Binomial Distribution

Cost-Efficient Fixed-Width Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Bernoulli Proportions

Fast algorithms of computing admissible intervals for discrete distributions with single parameter

An optimal exact interval for the risk ratio in the 2×2 table with structural zero

Two New Estimators for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses in Multiple Test