Abstract:This article presents the results of a research study that investigated the use of the in situ electrokinetic process for removing chromium, nickel, and cadmium from contaminated clays. For this study, electrokinetic experiments were conducted on two types of clays: kaolin, a commercial‐grade soil consisting mainly of kaolinite clay mineral, and glacial till, a fíeld derived clay that possesses a complex mineralogical composition. Two sets of experiments were performed. The first set of experiments consisted of clays contaminated with both chromium in its hexavalent form, Cr(VI), and nickel, Ni(II). Each of these contaminants was in a concentration of 500 mg/kg. The second set of experiments consisted of clays contaminated with Cr(VI), Ni(II), and cadmium, Cd(II), In concentrations of 500 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, and 250 mg/kg, respectively. These specific contaminants and contaminant concentration levels were selected to simulate typical electroplating waste conditions. In each test, the contaminated clay was subjected to an external voltage gradient of 1.3 VDC/cm for a duration of 4 d. The results of these experiments determined that in kaolin, a sharp pH gradient, ranging from approximately 2 near the anode to 12 near the cathode, was developed. However, in the glacial till, alkaline conditions (pH > 8) existed throughout the soil because of its high carbonate‐buffering capacity. These pH variations affected the adsorption‐desorption and dissolution‐precipitation of the contaminants and, consequently, affected the contaminant migration in the soil. The migration of the cationic metallic contaminants, Ni(II) and Cd(II), toward the cathode was higher in kaolin when compared with the glacial till. Because of high pH conditions near the cathode, Ni(II) and Cd(II) were precipitated in kaolin. In glacial till, however, because of alkaline conditions throughout the soil, most of Ni(II) and Cd(II) precipitated; consequently, the migration of these contaminants was restricted. The migration of the anionic contaminant Cr(VI) toward the anode was more efficient in the glacial till and also near the cathode region of kaolin because of low adsorption of Cr(VI) in high pH environments. Adsorption of Cr(VI) in low pH regions near the anode in kaolin caused low Cr(VI) removal. The synergistic effect of the co‐contaminants was Insignificant on both cationic and anionic contaminant migration in kaolin. However, in glacial till, the synergistic effects of co‐contaminants on anionic contaminant Cr(VI) was found significant, while the effect on cationic contaminant Ni(II) was insignificant Overall, this study demonstrated that adsorption, precipitation, and reduction were the significant fixation mechanisms of nickel, cadmium, and chromium in the contaminated soils during the electrokinetic process. In order to enhance contaminant removal by the electrokinetic process, conditioning of the electrodes must be implemented.

Toxic elements in soil and groundwater: short-time study on electrokinetic removal of arsenic in the presence of other ions

Arsenic Removal in Synthetic Ground Water Using Iron Electrolysis

Evaluation of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils

Effect of electrolyte, potential gradient and treatment time on remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by electrokinetic remediation and adsorption

Field Test on Electro-Osmosis in a Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil: Electrokinetic Remediation and Reinforcement of the Soil

Characteristics of Soil Pore Structure Response to Electric Field Strength and Their Effects on Cr(VI) Removal from a Historically Chromium-Contaminated Soil

Adopting electrocoagulation technology for removing arsenic from contaminated water

Electrokinetic remediation of arsenate spiked soil assisted by CNT-Co barrier--the effect of barrier position and processing fluid

Removal of chromium, nickel and cadmium from clays by in‐situ electrokinetic remediation

Removal of arsenic from arsenic-containing solution in a three-dimensional electrode reactor

Effective Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Soils by EK-PRB of Fe/Mn/C-LDH: Performance, Characteristics, and Mechanism.

Combined effects of high voltage gradient and electrolyte conditioning on electrokinetic remediation for chromium (VI)-contaminated soils

How does arsenic speciation (arsenite and arsenate) in groundwater affect the performance of an aerated electrocoagulation reactor and human health risk?

Electrokinetic Removal of Chromium and Copper from Contaminated Soils by Lactic Acid Enhancement in the Catholyte.

Remediation of As-contaminated Soils Using Citrate Extraction Coupled with Electrochemical Removal.

[Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Soils by Stainless Steel Electrodes as well as the Phenomenon and Mechanism of Electrode Corrosion and Crystallization]

[Mixture Leaching Remediation Technology of Arsenic Contaminated Soil].

High-efficiency removal of As(III) from groundwater using siderite as the iron source in the electrocoagulation process

Anionic surfactant-activated remediation of Pb, Cd, As contaminated soil by electrochemical technology

Simultaneous electrokinetic removal and in situ electrochemical degradation of a high nitrogen accumulated greenhouse soil

Decontamination of Cobalt-Polluted Soils Using an Enhanced Electro-kinetic Method, Employing Eco-friendly Conditions