Abstract:The computer-aided drug design field is constituted by a wide range of different approaches that can be roughly classified as either ligand- or receptor-based techniques. In order to design and develop new active ligands, ligand-based approaches use the information derived from the properties of ligands with known activity against the target of interest, whereas the receptor-based techniques use the information obtained from the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the target and from the analysis of ligand–receptor interactions. With regards to the receptor-based techniques, one of the key steps of almost all approaches is represented by the estimation of the binding strength between the ligand and the receptor. Indeed, a proper evaluation of this interaction can be profitably used to design new ligands characterized by a tighter binding with the target of interest. Unfortunately, the main limitation of docking calculation resides in the estimation of the ligand–receptor interaction, which is usually evaluated through simple scoring functions. In particular, the scoring functions are used for both qualitative and quantitative studies: they are used for ranking different binding poses of the same ligand, thus providing its most reliable binding orientation, and they can also be used for comparing from an energetical point of view the interaction of different ligands with the same receptor, thus ranking the ligands according to the relative binding affinities. Although the available scoring functions are able to suggest the most reliable binding orientation for a ligand, their ability to predict ligand-receptor binding affinity and correctly rank different ligands on this basis is often not satisfactory enough. Among the different approaches that can be applied to evaluate the ligand–receptor interaction, the accurate measurement of binding free energy plays a very important role and, in this field, the most rigorous theoretical method is represented by free-energy perturbation (FEP), which estimates the difference in free energy between two states by slowly changing one state to another through a number of nonphysical intermediate states, performing extended sampling at each intermediate state [<a href="#">1</a>]. Unfortunately, this method is extremely time consuming and therefore more approximate methods have been developed. In this context, the molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) developed by Kollman et al. [<a href="#">2</a>,<a href="#">3</a>] are among the most commonly used methods.

PBSA_E: A PBSA-Based Free Energy Estimator for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity

Pbsa_e: A Pbsa-Based Free Energy Estimator for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

An Accurate Free Energy Estimator: Based on MM/PBSA Combined with Interaction Entropy for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.

Improving the Performance of MM/PBSA in Protein-Protein Interactions Via the Screening Electrostatic Energy.

Assessing the Performance of Screening MM/PBSA in Protein-Ligand Interactions

Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 1: Evaluation of ABCG2 charge model on solvation free energy prediction and optimization of atom radii suitable for more accurate solvation free energy prediction by the PBSA method

What is the current value of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods in drug discovery?

MM/PB(GB)SA benchmarks on soluble proteins and membrane proteins

Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes

Improving the Performance of Screening MM/PBSA in Protein-Ligand Interactions via Machine Learning

Test Mm-Pb/Sa on True Conformational Ensembles of Protein-Ligand Complexes

Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.

Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures

Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA

Binding Free Energy Estimation for Protein-Ligand Complex Based on MM-PBSA with Various Partial Charge Models.

Accurate calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energies

SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex

Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Protein-ligand free energies of binding from full-protein DFT calculations: convergence and choice of exchange-correlation functional

End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design

Improving the accuracy of predicting protein-ligand binding-free energy with semiempirical quantum chemistry charge.