Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations
Edward King,Ruxi Qi,Han Li,Ray Luo,Erick Aitchison
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305
2021-03-25
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Abstract:Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305</a>.Discussion of apparent binding free energies with one titratable group, MBAR/PBSA accuracy, binding free energy predictions for all conditions, illustration of restraint definitions, decharging and VDW free energies from alchemical simulations, illustration of the UPA active site with ligand, B-Factor, GAFF and GAFF2 structure analysis, and correlation plots of binding affinity for ligand restraints, differing protonation states, with and without outlier and with MBAR/PBSA postprocessing (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305/suppl_file/ct0c01305_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical