Abstract:Introduction: DBS efficacy depends on accuracy. CT-MRI fusion is established for both stereotactic registration and electrode placement verification. The desire to streamline DBS workflows, reduce operative time, and minimize patient transfers has increased interest in portable imaging modalities such as the Medtronic O-arm ® and mobile CT. However, these remain expensive and bulky. 3D C-arm fluoroscopy (3DXT) units are a smaller and less costly alternative, albeit incompatible with traditional frame-based localization and without useful soft tissue resolution. We aimed to compare fusion of 3DXT and CT with pre-operative MRI to evaluate if 3DXT-MRI fusion alone is sufficient for accurate registration and reliable targeting verification. We further assess DBS targeting accuracy using a 3DXT workflow and compare radiation dosimetry between modalities. Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted DBS implantation using a workflow incorporating 3DXT which we describe. Two intra-operative 3DXT spins were performed for registration and accuracy verification followed by conventional CT post-operatively. Post-operative 3DXT and CT images were independently fused to the same pre-operative MRI sequence and co-ordinates generated for comparison. Registration accuracy was compared to 15 consecutive controls who underwent CT-based registration. Radial targeting accuracy was calculated and radiation dosimetry recorded. Results: Data were obtained from 29 leads in 15 consecutive patients. 3DXT registration accuracy was significantly superior to CT with mean error 0.22 ± 0.03 mm ( p < 0.0001). Mean Euclidean electrode tip position variation for CT to MRI versus 3DXT to MRI fusion was 0.62 ± 0.40 mm (range 0.0 mm–1.7 mm). In comparison, direct CT to 3DXT fusion showed electrode tip Euclidean variance of 0.23 ± 0.09 mm. Mean radial targeting accuracy assessed on 3DXT was 0.97 ± 0.54 mm versus 1.15 ± 0.55 mm on CT with differences insignificant ( p = 0.30). Mean patient radiation doses were around 80% lower with 3DXT versus CT ( p < 0.0001). Discussion: Mobile 3D C-arm fluoroscopy can be safely incorporated into DBS workflows for both registration and lead verification. For registration, the limited field of view requires the use of frameless transient fiducials and is highly accurate. For lead position verification based on MRI co-registration, we estimate there is around a 0.4 mm discrepancy between lead position seen on 3DXT versus CT when corrected for brain shift. This is similar to that described in O-arm ® or mobile CT series. For units where logistical or financial considerations preclude the acquisition of a cone beam CT or mobile CT scanner, our data support portable 3D C-arm fluoroscopy as an acceptable alternative with significantly lower radiation exposure.

Techniques of Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation and Accuracy Compared with the Frame-Based Technique

The Accuracy of Imaging Guided Targeting with Microelectrode Recoding in Subthalamic Nucleus for Parkinson's Disease: A Single-Center Experience

PO072 / #783 THE ACCURACY OF IMAGING GUIDED TARGETING WITH MICROELECTRODE RECODING IN STN FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

How Accurate Is Frameless Fiducial—Free Deep Brain Stimulation?

Phantom-Enhanced High Mechanical Accuracy for Frame-Based Deep Brain Stimulation

A Novel System for Stereotactic Surgery: Preliminary Evaluation of Targeting Accuracy

Automatic extraction of upper-limb kinematic activity using deep learning-based markerless tracking during deep brain stimulation implantation for Parkinson's disease: A proof of concept study

Study on accuracy of deep brain electrode implantation assisted by stereotactic neurosurgerical robot Tirobot Cranial

Accurate Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Placement Concurrent With Research Electrocorticography

Automatic Reconstruction of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Trajectories From CT Images Using Tracking and Morphological Analysis

Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis

Improved Stereotactic Procedure Enhances The Accuracy Of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Implantation In Non-Human Primates

A Bulk Retrospective Study of Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Biopsies of Intracranial Lesions Guided by Videometric Tracker

Robotic System for MRI-Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery

Review on Factors Affecting Targeting Accuracy of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Implantation Between 2001 and 2015

An Integrated Multi-physics Finite Element Modeling Framework for Deep Brain Stimulation: Preliminary Study on Impact of Brain Shift on Neuronal Pathways

Optimized Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery to Avoid Vascular Damage: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Path Planning for Various Deep Targets by MRI Image Fusion

Clinical analysis of 1434 cases of frameless stereotactic operation]

Application of intraoperative MRI and microelectrode recording in deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Evaluation of 3D C-Arm Fluoroscopy versus Diagnostic CT for Deep Brain Stimulation Stereotactic Registration and Post-Operative Lead Localization

Is awake physiological confirmation necessary for DBS treatment of Parkinson's disease today? A comparison of intraoperative imaging, physiology, and physiology imaging-guided DBS in the past decade