EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF),Maged Younes,Gabriele Aquilina,Laurence Castle,Karl‐Heinz Engel,Paul J Fowler,Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,Peter Fürst,Ursula Gundert‐Remy,Rainer Gürtler,Trine Husøy,Melania Manco,Wim Mennes,Peter Moldeus,Sabina Passamonti,Romina Shah,Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen,Polly Boon,Karlien Cheyns,Riccardo Crebelli,Rex FitzGerald,Claude Lambré,Manuela Mirat,Beate Ulbrich,Christiane Vleminckx,Agnieszka Mech,Ana Maria Rincon,Alexandra Tard,Zsuzsanna Horvath,Matthew Wright

Abstract:Sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228) were re‐evaluated in 2016, resulting in the setting of a temporary ADI of 0.7 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day. Following a European Commission call for data, the present follow‐up opinion assesses data provided by interested business operators (IBOs) and additional evidence identified in the publicly available literature. No new biological or toxicological data addressing the data gaps described in the re‐evaluation were submitted by IBOs. Taking into account data identified from the literature search, the Panel concluded that there was no substantial reduction in the uncertainties previously identified in the re‐evaluation. Therefore, the Panel considered that the available toxicity database was inadequate to derive an ADI and withdrew the current temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI). A margin of exposure (MOE) approach was considered appropriate to assess the risk for these food additives. A lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose of 38 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, which is lower than the previous reference point of 70 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, was estimated based on prolonged visual evoked potential latency. An assessment factor of 80 was applied for the assessment of the MoE. At the estimated dietary exposures, when using a refined exposure scenario (Data set D), MOEs at the maximum of 95th percentile ranges were below 80 for all population groups except for adolescents. The dietary exposures estimated using the maximum permitted levels would result in MOEs below 80 in all population groups at the maximum of the ranges of the mean, and for most of the population groups at both minimum and maximum of the ranges at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that this raises a safety concern for both dietary exposure scenarios. The Panel also performed a risk assessment for toxic elements present in sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228), based on data submitted by IBOs, and concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for arsenic, lead and mercury should be lowered and a maximum limit for cadmium should be introduced.

Evaluation of certain food additives

Food Additives: Overview of Related Safety Concerns

Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)

Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food

Assessing Food Additives: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Food additives: distribution and co-occurrence in 126,000 food products of the French market

Food additives: From functions to analytical methods

Scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 414 (FGE.414): 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde

Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228)

Food Additives and Child Health

Re‐evaluation of name of hydrogenated poly‐1‐decene (E 907) as food additive

The Japan Flavour and Fragrance Materials Association’s (JFFMA) safety assessment of acetal food flavouring substances uniquely used in Japan

Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives

Assessment of hepato-renal damage and genotoxicity induced by long-term exposure to five permitted food additives in rats

Safety and efficacy of aryl‐substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species

Re‐evaluation of aluminium sulphates (E 520–523) and sodium aluminium phosphate (E 541) as food additives

Artificial food additives: hazardous to long-term health

Safety assessment of the substance amines, di‐C14‐C20‐alkyl, oxidised, from hydrogenated vegetable oil, for use in food contact materials

Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives

Characterizing chronic and acute health risks of residues of veterinary drugs in food: latest methodological developments by the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives

Adverse reactions to food additives