EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF),Maged Younes,Gabriele Aquilina,Laurence Castle,Karl‐Heinz Engel,Paul J Fowler,Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,Peter Fürst,Ursula Gundert‐Remy,Rainer Gürtler,Trine Husøy,Melania Manco,Wim Mennes,Peter Moldeus,Sabina Passamonti,Romina Shah,Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen,Polly Boon,Karlien Cheyns,Riccardo Crebelli,Rex FitzGerald,Claude Lambré,Manuela Mirat,Beate Ulbrich,Christiane Vleminckx,Agnieszka Mech,Ana Maria Rincon,Alexandra Tard,Zsuzsanna Horvath,Matthew Wright

Abstract:Sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228) were re‐evaluated in 2016, resulting in the setting of a temporary ADI of 0.7 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day. Following a European Commission call for data, the present follow‐up opinion assesses data provided by interested business operators (IBOs) and additional evidence identified in the publicly available literature. No new biological or toxicological data addressing the data gaps described in the re‐evaluation were submitted by IBOs. Taking into account data identified from the literature search, the Panel concluded that there was no substantial reduction in the uncertainties previously identified in the re‐evaluation. Therefore, the Panel considered that the available toxicity database was inadequate to derive an ADI and withdrew the current temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI). A margin of exposure (MOE) approach was considered appropriate to assess the risk for these food additives. A lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose of 38 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, which is lower than the previous reference point of 70 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, was estimated based on prolonged visual evoked potential latency. An assessment factor of 80 was applied for the assessment of the MoE. At the estimated dietary exposures, when using a refined exposure scenario (Data set D), MOEs at the maximum of 95th percentile ranges were below 80 for all population groups except for adolescents. The dietary exposures estimated using the maximum permitted levels would result in MOEs below 80 in all population groups at the maximum of the ranges of the mean, and for most of the population groups at both minimum and maximum of the ranges at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that this raises a safety concern for both dietary exposure scenarios. The Panel also performed a risk assessment for toxic elements present in sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228), based on data submitted by IBOs, and concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for arsenic, lead and mercury should be lowered and a maximum limit for cadmium should be introduced.

Re‐evaluation of aluminium sulphates (E 520–523) and sodium aluminium phosphate (E 541) as food additives

Re‐evaluation of stannous chloride (E 512) as food additive

Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228)

Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)

Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives

Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of sodium bisulphate for all animal species except aquatic animals (Grillo Werke AG & Jones‐Hamilton Co.)

Safety assessment of the substance amines, di‐C14‐C20‐alkyl, oxidised, from hydrogenated vegetable oil, for use in food contact materials

Safety of hydroxyanthracene derivatives for use in food

Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review and modification of the existing maximum residue levels for aluminium phosphide and magnesium phosphide

Safety assessment of the substance silver nanoparticles for use in food contact materials

Scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 414 (FGE.414): 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde

Re-evaluation of argon (E 938) and helium (E 939) as food additives

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of iron (II) chelate of amino acids hydrate for all animal species

Safety assessment of the mixture of methyl‐branched and linear C14–C18 alkanamides, derived from fatty acids, for use in food contact materials

Safety and efficacy of aryl‐substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species

Risk assessment of aflatoxins in food

Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance asulam (variant evaluated asulam‐sodium)

Safety assessment of the substance calcium tert‐butylphosphonate for use in food contact materials

Approach followed for the refined exposure assessment as part of the safety assessment of food additives under re‐evaluation