Abstract:Background: Radiomics refers to the extraction of a large number of image biomarker describing the tumor phenotype displayed in a medical image. Extracted from positron emission tomography (PET) images, radiomics showed diagnostic and prognostic value for several cancer types. However, a large number of radiomic features are nonreproducible or highly correlated with conventional PET metrics. Moreover, radiomic features used in the clinic should yield relevant information about tumor texture. In this study, we propose a framework to identify technical and clinical meaningful features and exemplify our results using a PET non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) dataset. Materials and methods: The proposed selection procedure consists of several steps. A priori, we only include features that were found to be reproducible in a multicenter setting. Next, we apply a voxel randomization step to identify features that reflect actual textural information, that is, that yield in 90% of the patient scans a value significantly different from random texture. Finally, the remaining features were correlated with standard PET metrics to further remove redundancy with common PET metrics. The selection procedure was performed for different volume ranges, that is, excluding lesions with smaller volumes in order to assess the effect of tumor size on the results. To exemplify our procedure, the selected features were used to predict 1-yr survival in a dataset of 150 NSCLC patients. A predictive model was built using volume as predictive factor for smaller, and one of the selected features as predictive factor for bigger lesions. The prediction accuracy of the both models were compared with the prediction accuracy of volume. Results: The number of selected features depended on the lesion size included in the analysis. When including the whole dataset, from 19 features reflecting actual texture only two were found to be not strongly correlated with conventional PET metrics. When excluding lesions smaller than 11.49 and 33.10 mL (25 and 50 percentile of the dataset), four out of 27 features and 13 out of 29 features remained after eliminating features highly correlated with standard PET metrics. When excluding lesions smaller than 103.9 mL (75 percentile), 33 out of 53 features remained. For larger lesions, some of these features outperformed volume in terms of classification accuracy (increase of 4-10%). The combination of using volume as predictor for smaller and one of the selected features for larger lesions also improved the accuracy when compared with volume only (increase from 72% to 76%). Conclusion: When performing radiomic analysis for smaller lesions, it should be first carefully investigated if a textural feature reflects actual heterogeneity information. Next, verification of the absence of correlation with all conventional PET metrics is essential in order to assess the additional value of radiomic features. Radiomic analysis with lesions larger than 11.4 mL might give additional information to conventional metrics while at the same time reflecting actual tumor texture. Using a combination of volume and one of the selected features for prediction yields promise to increase accuracy and reliability of a radiomic model.

Reliability of PET/CT shape and heterogeneity features in functional and morphological components of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer tumors: a repeatability analysis in a prospective multi-center cohort

A heterogeneous phantom study for investigating the stability of PET images radiomic features with varying reconstruction settings

Intra-Tumour F-18-Fdg Uptake Heterogeneity Decreases The Reliability On Target Volume Definition With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging

SU‐E‐T‐40: Exploring the Reproducibility of Tumor Volumes Measured by Radiologist, Computer‐Aided Radiologist and Computer Alone

Test–Retest Reproducibility Analysis of Lung CT Image Features

Plausibility and redundancy analysis to select FDG-PET textural features in non-small cell lung cancer

Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data

Multicenter quantitative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performance harmonization: use of hottest voxels towards more robust quantification

Harmonization of Standard Uptake Values Across Different Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography Systems and Different Reconstruction Algorithms: Validation in Oncology Patients

Increasing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics for Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Cervical Cancer Using 3D Local Binary Pattern-Based Texture Features

Prospective inter- and intra-tracer repeatability analysis of radiomics features in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET scans in metastatic prostate cancer

CT texture analysis reliability in pulmonary lesions: the influence of 3D vs. 2D lesion segmentation and volume definition by a Hounsfield-unit threshold

PET Image Analysis of Tumor ~(18)F-FDG Uptake Heterogeneity

Heterogeneity analysis of 18F-FDG PET imaging in oncology: clinical indications and perspectives

Comparative Analysis of Repeatability in CT Radiomics and Dosiomics Features under Image Perturbation: A Study in Cervical Cancer Patients

Robustness of CT radiomics features: consistency within and between single-energy CT and dual-energy CT

Assessing the variability and correlation between SUV and ADC parameters of head and neck cancers derived from simultaneous PET/MRI: A single-center study

Quantitative Imaging: Erring Patterns in Manual Delineation of PET-imaged Lung Lesions

Reproducibility and Repeatability of CBCT-Derived Radiomics Features

Improved risk stratification by PET-based intratumor heterogeneity in children with high-risk neuroblastoma

The Exploration of Quantitative Intra-Tumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity in Dual-Time 18F-FDG PET/CT of Pancreatic Cancer.