Abstract:Background and objectives: Life History Theory (LHT) describes trade-offs that organisms make with regard to three investment pathways: growth, maintenance and reproduction. In light of the reparative functions of sleep, we examine sleep behaviors and corresponding attitudes as proximate manifestations of an individual's underlying relative prioritization of short-term reproduction versus long-term maintenance. Methodology: We collected survey data from 568 participants across two online studies having different participant pools. We use a mixture of segmented and hierarchical regression models, structural equation modeling and machine learning to infer relationships between sleep duration/quality, attitudes about sleep and biodemographic/psychometric measures of life history strategy (LHS). Results: An age-mediated U- or V-shaped relationship appears when LHS is plotted against habitual sleep duration, with the fastest strategies occupying the sections of the curve with the highest mortality risk: < 6.5 hr (short sleep) and > 8.5 hr (long sleep). LH 'fastness' is associated with increased sleepiness and worse overall sleep quality: delayed sleep onset latency, more wakefulness after sleep onset, higher sleep-wake instability and greater sleep duration variability. Hedonic valuations of sleep may mediate the effects of LHS on certain sleep parameters. Conclusions and implications: The costs of deprioritizing maintenance can be parameterized in the domain of sleep, where 'life history fastness' corresponds with sleep patterns associated with greater senescence and mortality. Individual differences in sleep having significant health implications can thus be understood as components of lifelong trajectories likely stemming from calibration to developmental circumstances. Relatedly, hedonic valuations of sleep may constitute useful avenues for non-pharmacological management of chronic sleep disorders.Lay Summary: Sleep is essential because it allows the body to repair and maintain itself. But time spent sleeping is time that cannot be spent doing other things. People differ in how much they prioritize immediate rewards, including sociosexual opportunities, versus long-term goals. In this research, we show that individual differences in sleep behaviors, and attitudes toward sleep, correspond with psychological and behavioral differences reflecting such differing priorities. Orientation toward sleep can thus be understood as part of the overall lifetime strategies that people pursue.

The evolution of sleep is inevitable

The origins and evolution of sleep

Sleep intensity and the evolution of human cognition

The Evolutionary Theory of Sleep and Wakefulness

A hypothesis on the selective advantage for sleep

Exploring the Evolution of Sleep Patterns From Infancy to Adolescence

Live fast, die young and sleep later: Life history strategy and human sleep behavior

The end of sleep: 'sleep debt' versus biological adaptation of human sleep to waking needs

Sleep and brain evolution across the human lifespan: A mutual embrace

The Mystery of Sleep Function: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

REM sleep vs exploratory wakefulness: Alternatives within adult 'sleep debt'?

Evo-devo applied to sleep research: an approach whose time has come

Towards a Quantitative, Metabolic Theory for Mammalian Sleep

Mathematical models for sleep-wake dynamics: comparison of the two-process model and a mutual inhibition neuronal model

Sleep Regulation and Insomnia

Mapping the physiological changes in sleep regulation across infancy and young childhood

Genetic contribution to sleep homeostasis in early adolescence

Ecological and social pressures interfere with homeostatic sleep regulation in the wild

Sleep as the solution to an optimization problem

More sleep for behavioral ecologists

Weekday and weekend sleep times across the human lifespan: a model-based simulation