The Evolutionary Theory of Sleep and Wakefulness

N. Kleitman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/PBM.1964.0053
2015-01-07
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Abstract:Which came first—the hen or the egg? In the alternation of sleep and wakefulness, which of the two states interrupts the other? Is the onset of sleep an active process or a mere cessation of wakefulness? By an evolutionary theory I presented earlier [i], sleep is a passive condition, and the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of the CNS (central nervous system) is reflected mainly in the characteristics of induced wakefulness: die subcortically controlled wakefulness of necessity gradually evolves into a cortically regulated wakefulness ofchoice, along with establishment of the 24-hour sleep-wakefulness rhythm. A certainty was expressed at that time that, as new facts were brought to light, modifications would have to be made in the theory. Discoveries since then suggest that there are evolutionary changes in sleep as well as in wakefulness, and revisions of the theory dictated by these discoveries are presented now. The onset and continuation ofsleep, as well as awakening and the maintenance of wakefulness, can conceivably be explained by postulating the stimulation and inhibition, or activity and rest, of a sleep center, wakefulness center, or two reciprocally innervated centers [2, chap. 35]. But examination of findings associated with destructive lesions in the brain stem results in the conclusion that the principal, if not the only, mechanism involved is a BSRF (brain stem reticular formation) center or system which, active, induces and maintains wakefulness and, inactive, leads to sleep. The possible existence of accessory or secondary hypnogenic systems— rostral, caudal, or within the BSRF—does not affect this conclusion fun-
Medicine,Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?