Abstract:A core tension in the study of plurality elections is the clash between the classic Hotelling-Downs model, which predicts that two office-seeking candidates should position themselves at the median voter's policy, and the empirical observation that real-world democracies often have two major parties with divergent policies. Motivated by this tension and drawing from bounded rationality, we introduce a dynamic model of candidate positioning based on a simple behavioral heuristic: candidates imitate the policy of previous winners. The resulting model is closely connected to evolutionary replicator dynamics and exhibits complex behavior, despite its simplicity. For uniformly-distributed voters, we prove that when there are $k = 2$, $3$, or $4$ candidates per election, any symmetric candidate distribution converges over time to a concentration of candidates at the center. With $k \ge 5$, however, we prove that the candidate distribution does not converge to the center. For initial distributions without any extreme candidates, we prove a stronger statement than non-convergence, showing that the density in an interval around the center goes to zero when $k \ge 5$. As a matter of robustness, our conclusions are qualitatively unchanged if a small fraction of candidates are not winner-copiers and are instead positioned uniformly at random. Beyond our theoretical analysis, we illustrate our results in simulation; for five or more candidates, we find a tendency towards the emergence of two clusters, a mechanism suggestive of Duverger's Law, the empirical finding that plurality leads to two-party systems. Our simulations also explore several variations of the model, including non-uniform voter distributions and other forms of noise, which exhibit similar convergence patterns. Finally, we discuss the relationship between our model and prior work on strategic equilibria of candidate positioning games.

Electoral Stability and Rigidity

Voters and the trade-off between policy stability and responsiveness

Designing Stable Elections: A Survey

Persistence in power of long-lived parties

Dislike of general opinion makes for tight elections

Political party strength and electoral violence

Party Competition in an American One-Party-Dominant System a Formal Analysis

Kinetic modeling of opinion formation of peoples via multiple political parties

Party statutes and party institutionalization

EL E C T O R A L SY S T E M S ,L E GI S L A TI V E PR O C E S S, A N D IN C CO O M E TA X A AT TI O N

Vulnerability of democratic electoral systems

Policy rules and political polarization

On the Robustness of Democratic Electoral Processes to Computational Propaganda

How population size affects party systems and cabinet duration

Electoral Systems, Legislative Process, and Income Taxation

Replicating Electoral Success

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Threats and Political Instability in Authoritarian Regimes: A Dynamic Theoretical Analysis

Do party system parameters explain differences in legislative organization? Fragmentation, polarization, and the density of regulation in European parliaments, 1945–2009