Abstract:This study proposes a novel technique that combines deep reinforcement learning with potential game theory for air defense decision‐making. The proposed method transforms the target assignment problem into a potential game that guarantees Nash equilibrium. This approach alleviates issues related to weak interpretability, lack of convergence guarantee, and high computing power requirements. This study addresses the challenge of intelligent decision‐making for command‐and‐control systems in air defense combat operations. Current autonomous decision‐making systems suffer from limited rationality and insufficient intelligence during operation processes. Recent studies have proposed methods based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to address these issues. However, DRL methods typically face challenges related to weak interpretability, lack of convergence guarantees, and high‐computing power requirements. To address these issues, a novel technique for large‐scale air defense decision‐making by combining a DRL technique with game theory is discussed. The proposed method transforms the target assignment problem into a potential game that provides theoretical guarantees for Nash equilibrium (NE) from a distributed perspective. The air‐defense decision problem is decomposed into separate target selection and target assignment problems. A DRL method is used to solve the target selection problem, while the target assignment problem is translated into a target assignment optimization game. This game is proven to be an exact potential game with theoretical convergence guarantees for an NE. Having simulated the proposed decision‐making method using a digital battlefield environment, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated.

Predicting Enemy's Actions Improves Commander Decision-Making

Think That Attackers Think: Using First-Order Theory of Mind in Intrusion Response System.

Ancillary Mechanism for Autonomous Decision-Making Process in Asymmetric Confrontation: a View from Gomoku

Toward a Research Agenda in Adversarial Reasoning: Computational Approaches to Anticipating the Opponent's Intent and Actions

Decision Aids for Adversarial Planning in Military Operations: Algorithms, Tools, and Turing-test-like Experimental Validation

Adversarial Decision-Making for Moving Target Defense: A Multi-Agent Markov Game and Reinforcement Learning Approach

Decoys Deployment for Missile Interception: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach

Deep Reinforcement Learning‐Based Air Defense Decision‐Making Using Potential Games

DDoD: Dual Denial of Decision Attacks on Human-AI Teams

Improving anti-jamming decision-making strategies for cognitive radar via multi-agent deep reinforcement learning

Towards a Cognitive Theory of Cyber Deception

Toward Personalized Deceptive Signaling for Cyber Defense Using Cognitive Models

Deceptive Planning for Resource Allocation

Applying Action Masking and Curriculum Learning Techniques to Improve Data Efficiency and Overall Performance in Operational Technology Cyber Security using Reinforcement Learning

Autonomous UAV maneuvering decisions by refining opponent strategies

Incorporating Deception into CyberBattleSim for Autonomous Defense

Mirage: cyber deception against autonomous cyber attacks in emulation and simulation

Recurrent Maddpg For Object Detection And Assignment In Combat Tasks

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence: A Survey

A Predictive Autonomous Decision Aid for Calibrating Human-Autonomy Reliance in Multi-Agent Task Assignment

Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality