Abstract:We present a game theoretic framework, modeling strategic interactions among humans and things, which are assumed to be interconnected by a social-technological network, as in Internet of Humans and Things (IOHT). Often a pair of agents in the network interacts in order for an informed sender-agent to signal an uninformed receiver-agent to take an action that benefits each of the players -- the benefits to the pair of agents are modeled by two separate utility functions, both depending on the sender's private information, the signal exchanged, and the receiver's revealed (and unrevealed) action. In general, the two agents' utilities may not be aligned and may encourage deceptive behavior. For example, a sender, aware of his own private "state of ignorance," may seek useful information from a receiver who owns powerful computational resources to search a large corpora of webpages; the sender does so by sending a signal to the receiver in the-form of a keyword. Obvious examples of deceptiveness here range from attempts to hide one's intentions to auctioning the keywords on an ad exchange through real-time bidding. A rather troublesome situation occurs when deceptions are employed to breach the security of the system, thus making the entire social-technological network unreliable. Earlier, we proposed a signaling-game-theoretic framework to alleviate this problem. This paper further enhances it by reconfiguring signals to possess more complex structures (epistatic signals to represent attack and defense options over a given set of vulnerabilities). We explore two augmentations to the original evolutionary signaling game by first enhancing mutation bias toward strategies performing well in previous populations and secondly by allowing the parameters of the utility functions to dependent on population preferences giving rise to a minority game with epistatic signaling. The resulting game systems are empirically studied through extensive computer simulation.

Osteoradionecrosis of the skull after radiation therapy for invasive carcinoma.

Towards a Cognitive Theory of Cyber Deception

Game of Travesty: Decoy-based Psychological Cyber Deception for Proactive Human Agents

Learning to Defend by Attacking (and Vice-Versa): Transfer of Learning in Cybersecurity Games

A Game-theoretic Taxonomy and Survey of Defensive Deception for Cybersecurity and Privacy

Think That Attackers Think: Using First-Order Theory of Mind in Intrusion Response System.

Personalized Model‐Driven Interventions for Decisions From Experience

Deception by Design: Evidence-Based Signaling Games for Network Defense

Learning About Simulated Adversaries from Human Defenders using Interactive Cyber-Defense Games

Game-Theoretic and Machine Learning-based Approaches for Defensive Deception: A Survey

Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare

Reward-Based Deception with Cognitive Bias

Phishing for Phools in the Internet of Things: Modeling One-to-Many Deception using Poisson Signaling Games

Epistemic Signaling Games for Cyber Deception with Asymmetric Recognition

Simulations in Cyber-Security: A Review of Cognitive Modeling of Network Attackers, Defenders, and Users

Asymptotic Security using Bayesian Defense Mechanism with Application to Cyber Deception

Adversarial Reconnaissance Mitigation and Modeling

Dynamic Bayesian Games for Adversarial and Defensive Cyber Deception

Cyber Security via Minority Games with Epistatic Signaling

A Differentially Private Game Theoretic Approach for Deceiving Cyber Adversaries

Incorporating Deception into CyberBattleSim for Autonomous Defense