Abstract:Background: A traditional lecture-based pedagogy conveys information and content while lacking sufficient development of critical thinking skills and problem solving. A puzzle-based pedagogy creates a broader contextual framework, and fosters critical thinking as well as logical reasoning skills that can then be used to improve a student's performance on content specific assessments. This paper describes a pedagogical comparison of traditional lecture-based teaching and puzzle-based teaching in a Human Anatomy and Physiology II Lab. Methods: Using a single subject/cross-over design half of the students from seven sections of the course were taught using one type of pedagogy for the first half of the semester, and then taught with a different pedagogy for the second half of the semester. The other half of the students were taught the same material but with the order of the pedagogies reversed. Students' performance on quizzes and exams specific to the course, and in-class assignments specific to this study were assessed for: learning outcomes (the ability to form the correct conclusion or recall specific information), and authentic academic performance as described by (Am J Educ 104:280-312, 1996). Results: Our findings suggest a significant improvement in students' performance on standard course specific assessments using a puzzle-based pedagogy versus a traditional lecture-based teaching style. Quiz and test scores for students improved by 2.1 and 0.4% respectively in the puzzle-based pedagogy, versus the traditional lecture-based teaching. Additionally, the assessments of authentic academic performance may only effectively measure a broader conceptual understanding in a limited set of contexts, and not in the context of a Human Anatomy and Physiology II Lab. Conclusion: In conclusion, a puzzle-based pedagogy, when compared to traditional lecture-based teaching, can effectively enhance the performance of students on standard course specific assessments, even when the assessments only test a limited conceptual understanding of the material.

Effects of Reducing Scaffolding in an Undergraduate Electronics Lab

A scaffolded curriculum to foster experimental skills acquisition in an introductory physics lab course

Experimental design laboratories in introductory physics courses: enhancing cognitive tasks and deep conceptual learning

Scaffolded Instruction Improves Student Understanding of the Scientific Method & Experimental Design

Using lab notebooks to examine students' engagement in modeling in an upper-division electronics lab course

Improvement or selection? A longitudinal analysis of students' views about experimental physics in their lab courses

Puzzle-based versus traditional lecture: comparing the effects of pedagogy on academic performance in an undergraduate human anatomy and physiology II lab

Scaffolding as a cognitive load reduction strategy for teaching atomic and nuclear physics

Development of modular and accessible teaching labs, incorporating modelling and practical experimentation

Studying Expert Practices to Create Learning Goals for Electronics Labs

Investigating the Design--Science Connection in a multi-week Engineering Design (ED)-based introductory physics laboratory task

Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content

External constraints that led to physiology lab improvements

Students' views about the nature of experimental physics

Using Laboratory Experiments and Circuit Simulation IT Tools in an Undergraduate Course in Analog Electronics

Teaching requirements: Can a short lecture make a real difference?

Developing skills vs reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from E-CLASS

Lessons from Transforming Second-Year Honors Physics Lab

A Novel Approach to Encourage Students Independent Thinking in the Physics Laboratory

The process of constructing new knowledge: an undergraduate laboratory exercise facilitated by a vacuum capacitor-resistor circuit

Do Computer Simulations Allow a Better Understanding of Basic Electrical Circuits than Real Lab Experiments?