Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

Bounding quantification in parametric expansions of Presburger arithmetic

An efficient quantifier elimination procedure for Presburger arithmetic

On Presburger arithmetic extended with non-unary counting quantifiers

Distal expansions of Presburger arithmetic by a sparse predicate

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

On the Decidability of Presburger Arithmetic Expanded with Powers

Characterizing Propositional Proofs As Non-Commutative Formulas.

Undefinability of multiplication in Presburger arithmetic with sets of powers

On Quantifiers for Quantitative Reasoning

A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

A Generalized Method for Proving Polynomial Calculus Degree Lower Bounds

Unary counting quantifiers do not increase the expressive power of Presburger aritmetic: an alternative shorter proof

On two-variable guarded fragment logic with expressive local Presburger constraints

Extensions of the Cylindrical Algebraic Covering Method for Quantifiers

Decidability of extensions of Presburger arithmetic by generalised polynomials

Quantifiers closed under partial polymorphisms

Bounded-Depth Frege Lower Bounds for Random 3-CNFs via Deterministic Restrictions

Bounded arithmetic AID for Frege system

Freely adding one layer of quantifiers to a Boolean doctrine

Parallel Play Saves Quantifiers

Proof-theoretic methods in quantifier-free definability