Abstract:Symptoms have been used to diagnose conditions such as frailty and mental illnesses. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the numbers of symptoms has not been well studied. This study aims to use equations and simulations to demonstrate how the factors that determine symptom incidence influence symptoms' diagnostic accuracy for disease diagnosis. Assuming a disease causing symptoms and correlated with the other disease in 10,000 simulated subjects, 40 symptoms occurred based on 3 epidemiological measures: proportions diseased, baseline symptom incidence (among those not diseased), and risk ratios. Symptoms occurred with similar correlation coefficients. The sensitivities and specificities of single symptoms for disease diagnosis were exhibited as equations using the three epidemiological measures and approximated using linear regression in simulated populations. The areas under curves (AUCs) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was the measure to determine the diagnostic accuracy of multiple symptoms, derived by using 2 to 40 symptoms for disease diagnosis. With respect to each AUC, the best set of sensitivity and specificity, whose difference with 1 in the absolute value was maximal, was chosen. The results showed sensitivities and specificities of single symptoms for disease diagnosis were fully explained with the three epidemiological measures in simulated subjects. The AUCs increased or decreased with more symptoms used for disease diagnosis, when the risk ratios were greater or less than 1, respectively. Based on the AUCs, with risk ratios were similar to 1, symptoms did not provide diagnostic values. When risk ratios were greater or less than 1, maximal or minimal AUCs usually could be reached with less than 30 symptoms. The maximal AUCs and their best sets of sensitivities and specificities could be well approximated with the three epidemiological and interaction terms, adjusted R-squared ≥ 0.69. However, the observed overall symptom correlations, overall symptom incidence, and numbers of symptoms explained a small fraction of the AUC variances, adjusted R-squared ≤ 0.03. In conclusion, the sensitivities and specificities of single symptoms for disease diagnosis can be explained fully by the at-risk incidence and the 1 minus baseline incidence, respectively. The epidemiological measures and baseline symptom correlations can explain large fractions of the variances of the maximal AUCs and the best sets of sensitivities and specificities. These findings are important for researchers who want to assess the diagnostic accuracy of composite diagnostic criteria.

How to assess case-finding in chronic diseases: Comparison of different indices

New ways of estimating excess mortality of chronic diseases: Insights from the illness-death model

An identifiability problem in a state model for partly undetected chronic diseases

Estimation of excess mortality in a chronic condition from current status data with disease duration: simulation study about need for long-term care

Handling missing disease information due to death in diseases that need two visits to diagnose

CASE-CONTROL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS WITH A GENERAL SEMIPARAMETRIC SHARED FRAILTY MODEL - A PSEUDO FULL LIKELIHOOD APPROACH

Estimation of the excess mortality in chronic diseases from prevalence and incidence data

Estimation of mortality rate ratios for chronic conditions with misclassification of disease status at death

A decision-making model with similarity measurement for case selection in public health treatment

The conditional approach to evaluating detection performance

A novel nonparametric time‐dependent precision–recall curve estimator for right‐censored survival data

Consistency Research on Two Kinds of Health Assessment Index

Comparison of cumulative incidence functions of current status competing risks data with discrete observation times

Statistical inference for diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple comparisons

Assessing the public health relevance of a risk factor

A tutorial on evaluating time-varying discrimination accuracy for survival models used in dynamic decision-making

A multiple testing framework for diagnostic accuracy studies with co-primary endpoints

Comparing broad and narrow phenotype algorithms: differences in performance characteristics and immortal time incurred

Medical diagnostic accuracy measures: an innovative approach based on the area under predictive values curves

A Two-Stage Bayesian Method for Estimating Accuracy and Disease Prevalence for Two Dependent Dichotomous Screening Tests when the Status of Individuals Who Are Negative on Both Tests is Unverified

Diagnostic accuracy of symptoms for an underlying disease: a simulation study