Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

Does consciousness really collapse the wave function? A possible objective biophysical resolution of the measurement problem

Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function

The argument for an objective wave function collapse: Why spontaneous localization collapse or no-collapse decoherence cannot solve the measurement problem in a subjective fashion

Collapse and Measures of Consciousness

Consciousness and the Problem of Quantum Measurement

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

Contextual Wavefunction collapse: an integrated theory of quantum measurement

Can We Falsify the Consciousness-Causes-Collapse Hypothesis in Quantum Mechanics?

Spontaneous Collapse of the Wavefunction: A Testable Proposal Motivated by Discrete Physics

Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness (and the other way around)

Is Wave Function Collapse Necessary? Explaining Quantum Nondemolition Measurement of a Spin Qubit within Linear Evolution

Is spontaneous wave function collapse testable at all?

Dynamical quantum collapse and an experimental test

Continuous Observations and the Wave Function Collapse

Can the Many-Worlds-Interpretation be probed in Psychology?

Considerations on the collapse of the wavefunction

The Dead-Alive Physicist experiment: a case-study disproving the hypothesis that consciousness causes the wave-function collapse in the quantum measurement process

Consciousness and the Wigner's friend problem

Can quantum physics help solve the hard problem of consciousness? A hypothesis based on entangled spins and photons

Building a quantum superposition of conscious states with integrated information theory