Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

The argument for an objective wave function collapse: Why spontaneous localization collapse or no-collapse decoherence cannot solve the measurement problem in a subjective fashion

Does consciousness really collapse the wave function? A possible objective biophysical resolution of the measurement problem

Is spontaneous wave function collapse testable at all?

Spontaneous Collapse of the Wavefunction: A Testable Proposal Motivated by Discrete Physics

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function

How quantum mechanics with deterministic collapse localizes macroscopic objects

Wave Function Collapse, Correlating Interactions, and Conservation Laws

A direct test for instantaneous collapse of wave functions in configuration space

Contextual Wavefunction collapse: an integrated theory of quantum measurement

Collapse of Probability Distributions in Relativistic Spacetime

The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence

Considerations on the collapse of the wavefunction

Continuous Observations and the Wave Function Collapse

A proposal for a new kind of spontaneous collapse model

How the instant collapse of a spatially-extended quantum state is consistent with relativity of simultaneity

Nonlinear Dynamics of the Perceived Pitch of Complex Sounds

The case of Quantum Gravity with Spontaneous Collapse of the Wave Function

Dynamical quantum collapse and an experimental test

Wave Function Collapse, Lorentz Invariance, and the Third Postulate of Relativity

Is Wave Function Collapse Necessary? Explaining Quantum Nondemolition Measurement of a Spin Qubit within Linear Evolution