Abstract:Abstract Objective To characterize the use and impact of radiation dose reduction techniques in actual practice for routine abdomen CT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive routine abdomen CT scans in adults from a large dose registry, contributed by 95 hospitals and imaging facilities. Grouping exams into deciles by, first, patient size, and second, size-adjusted dose length product (DLP), we summarized dose and technical parameters and estimated which parameters contributed most to between-protocols dose variation. Lastly, we modeled the total population dose if all protocols with mean size-adjusted DLP above 433 or 645 mGy-cm were reduced to these thresholds. Results A total of 748,846 CTs were performed using 1033 unique protocols. When sorted by patient size, patients with larger abdominal diameters had increased dose and effective mAs (milliampere seconds), even after adjusting for patient size. When sorted by size-adjusted dose, patients in the highest versus the lowest decile in size-adjusted DLP received 6.4 times the average dose (1680 vs 265 mGy-cm) even though diameter was no different (312 vs 309 mm). Effective mAs was 2.1-fold higher, unadjusted CTDI vol 2.9-fold, and phase 2.5-fold for patients in the highest versus lowest size-adjusted DLP decile. There was virtually no change in kV (kilovolt). Automatic exposure control was widely used to modulate mAs, whereas kV modulation was rare. Phase was the strongest driver of between-protocols variation. Broad adoption of optimized protocols could result in total population dose reductions of 18.6–40%. Conclusion There are large variations in radiation doses for routine abdomen CT unrelated to patient size. Modification of kV and single-phase scanning could result in substantial dose reduction. Clinical relevance Radiation dose-optimization techniques for routine abdomen CT are routinely under-utilized leading to higher doses than needed. Greater modification of technical parameters and number of phases could result in substantial reduction in radiation exposure to patients. Key Points • Based on an analysis of 748,846 routine abdomen CT scans in adults, radiation doses varied tremendously across patients of the same size and optimization techniques were routinely under-utilized. • The difference in observed dose was due to variation in technical parameters and phase count. Automatic exposure control was commonly used to modify effective mAs, whereas kV was rarely adjusted for patient size. Routine abdomen CT should be performed using a single phase, yet multi-phase was common. • kV modulation by patient size and restriction to a single phase for routine abdomen indications could result in substantial reduction in radiation doses using well-established dose optimization approaches.

Dose audit and evaluation of work practices during barium procedures using digital radiography techniques

Evaluation of patient doses due to fluoroscopic exposures

Radiation Exposure to Patients During Examinations of Direct Radiography System

Real-Time Patient and Staff Radiation Dose Monitoring in IR Practice

Dose reduction in double contrast barium enema by use of low fluoroscopic current

Benefits and limitations for the use of radiation dose management systems in medical imaging. Practical experience in a university hospital

Analysis of radiation dose to patients during abdominal interventional radiology

Assessment of occupational dose during abdominal fluoroscopic-guided procedures in Thailand using nanoDot OSL dosimeters

Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review

ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE IN THE MAIN PAEDIATRIC INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES

Investigation of X-radiation Dose to Patients in the Comprehensive Surgical Treatment Field Shelter During Interventional Therapy

Radiation safety measures in diagnostic nuclear medicine, based on the potential radiation dose emitted by radioactive patients

On the Placement of Apron Dosemeters and Dose Assessment in Interventional Cardiology Procedures: Preliminary Results.

A Review of Doses for Dental Imaging in 2010-2020 and Development of a Web Dose Calculator

Decreasing Radiation Doses in Digital Subtraction Angiographies Consecutively Performed by Trainees

Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system

Evaluation of Radiation Exposure and Influential Factors in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of the Head and Abdomen during Interventional Procedures

Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose During Intervention Therapy Between Field Shelter and Catheterization Room

Prospective dose monitoring using a manual dose management system: experience in brain computed tomography from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria

Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures

Large variation in radiation dose for routine abdomen CT: reasons for excess and easy tips for reduction