Echogenicity as a standalone nodule characteristic is non-inferior to the TIRADS systems in the 10 to 20 mm nodule diameter range in patient selection for fine needle aspiration; a pilot study

Karoly Rucz,Laszlo Hegedus,Steen Joop Bonnema,Andrea Frasoldati,Laszlo Jambor,Gabor Laszlo Kovacs,Enrico Papini,Gilles Russ,Zsolt Karanyi,Endre V. Nagy,Tamas Solymosi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/etj-24-0149
2024-10-10
European Thyroid Journal
Abstract:Objective. The ultrasound evaluation of thyroid nodules (TN) in patient selection for fine needle aspiration (FNA) requires both uniformly accepted definitions of each nodule characteristic and extensive experience of the examiner. We hypothesized that nodule echogenicity alone may provide comparable performance to the more complex approaches, in patient selection for FNA. Patients and Methods. Seven highly experienced investigators from four countries evaluated, online, the ultrasound (US) video recordings of 123 histologically verified TN, by answering 17 nodule characteristics-related questions. The diagnostic performances of five TN image reporting and data systems (TIRADS) were compared to making decisions based alone on echogenicity of the nodule, for indicating FNA in 110 nodules ≥10 mm. Results. In the 10 to 20 mm size range, the sensitivities and specificities of the five TIRADS systems in identifying malignant nodules was 80.5%-91.0%, and 31.4-50.9%, respectively. Had FNA been recommended in all hypoechoic nodules, disregarding other US characteristics, comparable sensitivity and specificity (87.5% and 43.4%, respectively) were obtained. Compared to nodules >20mm, a higher proportion of cancers were hypoechoic in the 10 to 20 mm size range (87.2% vs. 77.8%, p=0.05). In the 10-20 mm size range, compared to hypoechoic nodules, a significantly lower proportion of isoechoic nodules demonstrated suspicious findings (70.7% vs. 30.0%, p 20 mm diameter nodules, the recommendation of FNA may rely on a single US feature, echogenicity, in the 10-20 mm size range. If independently confirmed in larger cohorts, this may simplify nodule evaluation in this size range.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?