Predictive value of the single most suspicious ultrasound feature in subcentimeter thyroid nodules: a retrospective observational cohort study

Peiying Huang,Lili Han,Xiulin Shi,Fangsen Xiao,Qingbao Shen,Xuejun Li,Fuxing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05895-z
2024-08-06
Abstract:Purpose: Proper management of subcentimeter thyroid nodules remains challenging for both clinicians and patients. Conducting extensive sonographic research using a safe and inexpensive tool for identifying thyroid nodules is necessary. The aim of this study was to identify whether having the highest-risk ultrasound (US) characteristic suggests that US-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of subcentimeter nodules is more appropriate for the identification of malignancy than active surveillance (AS) or surgery. Methods: The data of patients with highly suspicious subcentimeter thyroid nodules and US characteristic data who underwent surgery were retrospectively examined. Results: Among a total of 556 subcentimeter nodules, 223 (40.1%) were benign, and 333 (59.9%) were malignant, with a mean maximal nodule size of 8.1 mm. In addition to age younger than 45 years, several US features were significantly associated with malignancy: irregular margins, the presence of microcalcifications, and taller-than-wide shapes (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that a taller-than-wide shape (OR = 8.988, P = 0.0015) was an independent factor associated with malignancy in subcentimeter thyroid nodules. The diagnostic performance of preoperative FNA was classified as a malignancy, with a sensitivity of 98.4%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 76.9%. Conclusions: This is one of the few reports based on actual data of the most suspicious US features in subcentimeter thyroid nodules. A taller-than-wide shape US feature is most significantly associated with malignancy. FNA is a simple, accurate, and reliable preoperative method for diagnosing malignant subcentimeter thyroid nodules with highly suspicious US characteristics. AS was less appropriate than FNA for subcentimeter nodules with a taller-than-wide shape, especially in patients ≤ 45 years of age.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?