Abstract:The Eppley Hannah thought experiment is often cited as justification for attempts by theorists to develop a complete, consistent theory of quantum gravity. A modification of the earlier "Heisenberg microscope" argument for the necessity of quantized light, the Eppley-Hannah thought experiment purports to show that purely classical gravitational waves would either not conserve energy or else allow for violations of the uncertainty principle. However, several subsequent papers have cast doubt as to the validity of the Eppley-Hannah argument. In this paper, we attempt to resurrect the Eppley-Hannah thought experiment by modifying the original argument in such a manner as to render it immune to the present criticisms levied against it.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Must gravity be quantized?**
Specifically, by re - examining the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment, the paper explores whether classical gravity will lead to a conflict with the uncertainty principle within the framework of quantum mechanics. If classical gravity can lead to such a conflict, then gravity must be quantized to maintain the consistency of quantum mechanics.
### Main content and conclusions:
1. **Background of the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment**:
- Since the birth of quantum theory, physicists have been trying to quantize gravity.
- Although these efforts have produced a lot of new mathematical and physical results, there is still no complete and consistent quantum gravity theory at present.
- There is no experimental evidence to support quantized gravity, so whether gravity must be quantized remains an unsolved problem.
2. **Core of the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment**:
- This experiment assumes the existence of a particle with the minimum uncertainty, and its momentum uncertainty \(\Delta p_i\) and position uncertainty \(\Delta x_i\) satisfy:
\[
\Delta p_i\Delta x_i=\frac{\hbar}{2}
\]
- If gravity is classical, a gravitational wave packet with an arbitrarily short wavelength \(\lambda\) and an arbitrarily small momentum \(p\) can be prepared, scattered onto the particle, and then the scattered wave packet can be detected to locate the position of the particle with a precision of:
\[
\Delta x_f\approx\lambda
\]
- Thus, the position uncertainty \(\Delta x_f\) and momentum uncertainty \(\Delta p_f\) of the particle will satisfy:
\[
\Delta p_f\Delta x_f <\frac{\hbar}{2}
\]
- This violates the uncertainty principle, so either gravity must be quantized, or the uncertainty principle or momentum conservation no longer holds.
3. **Controversies over the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment**:
- The entire argument of the experiment is based on the fact that the classical gravitational wave packet can collapse the wave function of the target particle.
- Some scholars believe that if gravity does not collapse the wave function, it will not lead to super - luminal communication, so the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment may not hold.
- Other scholars believe that the equipment required for the experiment cannot be constructed in principle, or the required measurements cannot be made.
4. **Main contributions of the paper**:
- The paper re - argues that gravity must collapse the wave function of quantum particles.
- A modified version of the Eppley - Hannah detector is proposed, which can theoretically conduct the experiment without forming a black hole.
- By choosing appropriate parameters, it is shown that the modified experiment can violate the uncertainty principle without violating general relativity and quantum mechanics.
### Conclusion:
By re - analyzing the Eppley - Hannah thought experiment, the paper proposes the necessity of quantizing gravity. Although there are some theoretical controversies and practical difficulties, the paper provides a new perspective and further promotes the discussion of the quantum gravity problem.