Abstract:<p>This work is an initial step toward developing a cognitive theory of cyber deception. While widely studied, the psychology of deception has largely focused on physical cues of deception. Given that present-day communication among humans is largely electronic, we focus on the cyber domain where physical cues are unavailable and for which there is less psychological research. To improve cyber defense, researchers have used signaling theory to extended algorithms developed for the optimal allocation of limited defense resources by using deceptive signals to trick the human mind. However, the algorithms are designed to protect against adversaries that make perfectly rational decisions. In behavioral experiments using an abstract cybersecurity game (i.e., Insider Attack Game), we examined human decision-making when paired against the defense algorithm. We developed an instance-based learning (IBL) model of an attacker using the Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) cognitive architecture to investigate how humans make decisions under deception in cyber-attack scenarios. Our results show that the defense algorithm is more effective at reducing the probability of attack and protecting assets when using deceptive signaling, compared to no signaling, but is less effective than predicted against a perfectly rational adversary. Also, the IBL model replicates human attack decisions accurately. The IBL model shows how human decisions arise from experience, and how memory retrieval dynamics can give rise to cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias. The implications of these findings are discussed in the perspective of informing theories of deception and designing more effective signaling schemes that consider human bounded rationality.</p>

Cyber-Deception and Attribution in Capture-the-Flag Exercises

Argumentation Models for Cyber Attribution

Battle Ground: Data Collection and Labeling of CTF Games to Understand Human Cyber Operators

An Argumentation-Based Framework to Address the Attribution Problem in Cyber-Warfare

Towards a Cognitive Theory of Cyber Deception

Towards in-situ Psychological Profiling of Cybercriminals Using Dynamically Generated Deception Environments

Game of Travesty: Decoy-based Psychological Cyber Deception for Proactive Human Agents

Decoys in Cybersecurity: An Exploratory Study to Test the Effectiveness of 2-sided Deception

Capture the Flag for Team Construction in Cybersecurity

Incorporating Deception into CyberBattleSim for Autonomous Defense

A Game-theoretic Taxonomy and Survey of Defensive Deception for Cybersecurity and Privacy

Detecting Trojaned DNNs Using Counterfactual Attributions

Cybersecurity Knowledge and Skills Taught in Capture the Flag Challenges

Cyber Deception Reactive: TCP Stealth Redirection to On-Demand Honeypots

A Machine Learning based Empirical Evaluation of Cyber Threat Actors High Level Attack Patterns over Low level Attack Patterns in Attributing Attacks

Three Decades of Deception Techniques in Active Cyber Defense -- Retrospect and Outlook

IPAttributor: Cyber Attacker Attribution with Threat Intelligence-Enriched Intrusion Data

Game-Theoretic Decision Support for Cyber Forensic Investigations

Active Deception using Factored Interactive POMDPs to Recognize Cyber Attacker's Intent

Toward Personalized Deceptive Signaling for Cyber Defense Using Cognitive Models

Weaving Tangled Webs: Offense, Defense, and Deception in Cyberspace