Abstract:Neurons in the early visual cortex respond selectively to multiple features of visual stimuli, but they respond differently to repeated presentation of the same visual stimulus. Such trial-to-trial response variabilities are often treated as noise and addressed by simple trial-averaging to obtain the stimulus-driven response, though this approach is insufficient to fully remove the response variability. More importantly, there is evidence that response variability may primarily be caused by non-sensory factors, particularly by variations in cortical state. Here we recorded and analyzed neuronal spiking activity in response to natural images from areas 17 and 18 of cats, along with local population neuronal signals; local field potential (LFP) and multi-unit activity (MUA). We used a variability ratio (VR) measure to quantify the variability of neural responses across trials and two cortical state indicative measures; global fluctuation index (GFI) calculated using MUA and synchrony index (SI) calculated using LFP signals. We propose a compact convolutional neural network model with two parallel pathways, to capture the stimulus-driven activity and the cortical state-driven response variabilities. The stimulus-driven pathway contains a spatiotemporal filter, a parametric rectifier and a Gaussian map and the cortical state-driven pathway contains temporal filters for MUA and LFP. The model parameters are fit to best predict the spiking activity of each neuron. Single neurons showed highly varying degrees of trial-to-trial response variability, even when recorded simultaneously. The fitted model performed with a significantly higher accuracy in predicting neural responses compared to a basic model with a stimulus-driven pathway alone. The neurons with higher response variability benefited more from the cortical state-driven pathway compared to less variable neurons. These results provide insights to understanding the possibility of trial-to-trial response variabilities emerging as an effect of cortical state dynamics.

Inference based method for realignment of single trial neuronal responses

Stimulus-aware spatial filtering for single-trial neural response and temporal response function estimation in high-density EEG with applications in auditory research

[Can the decreased number of cases of drunken driving be stabilised? Availability of alcohol leads to higher consumption].

Attention-Based Deep Spiking Neural Networks for Temporal Credit Assignment Problems.

Almost free of calibration for SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces

Reduction of Trial-to-trial Perceptual Variability by Intracortical Tonic Inhibition

A new family of statistical tests for neuronal spiking and autocorrelated timeseries data

Single-trial estimation of stimulus and spike-history effects on time-varying ensemble spiking activity of multiple neurons: a simulation study

Average Is Optimal: An Inverted-U Relationship between Trial-to-Trial Brain Activity and Behavioral Performance

Latency correction in sparse neuronal spike trains with overlapping global events

Fast computation of the statistical significance test for spatio-temporal receptive field estimates obtained using spike-triggered averaging of binary pseudo-random sequences

Inference of network connectivity from temporally binned spike trains

Detecting Abrupt Change In Neuronal Tuning Via Adaptive Point Process Estimation

Heavy-tailed statistics of cortical representational drift are advantageous for stabilised downstream readouts

Time-varying $\ell_0$ optimization for Spike Inference from Multi-Trial Calcium Recordings

Trial matching: capturing variability with data-constrained spiking neural networks

Adaptive virtual referencing for the extraction of extracellularly recorded action potentials in noisy environments

Cortical state contributions to response variability in the early visual cortex: A system identification approach

A Modular Implementation to Handle and Benchmark Drift Correction for High-Density Extracellular Recordings

Nonlinear Deconvolution by Sampling Biophysically Plausible Hemodynamic Models

If overuse injury is a ‘training load error’, should undertraining be viewed the same way?