Abstract:Structural Dissimilarity Sampling (SDS) is proposed as an efficient conformational search method to promote structural transitions essential for the biological functions of proteins. In SDS, initial structures are selected based on structural dissimilarity, and conformational resampling is repeated. Conformational resampling is performed as follows: (I) arrangement of initial structures for a diverse distribution at the edge of a conformational subspace and (II) promotion of the structural transitions with multiple short-time molecular dynamics (MD) simulations restarting from the diversely distributed initial structures. Cycles of (I) and (II) are repeated to intensively promote structural transitions because conformational resampling from the initial structures would quickly expand conformational distributions toward unvisited conformational subspaces. As a demonstration, SDS was first applied to maltodextrin binding protein (MBP) in explicit water to reproduce structural transitions between the open and closed states of MBP. Structural transitions of MBP were successfully reproduced with SDS in nanosecond-order simulation times. Starting from both the open and closed forms, SDS successfully reproduced the structural transitions within 25 cycles (a total of 250 ns of simulation time). For reference, a conventional long-time (500 ns) MD simulation under NPT (300 K and 1 bar) starting from the open form failed to reproduce the structural transition. In addition to the open-closed motions of MBP, SDS was applied to folding processes of the fast-folding proteins (chignolin, Trp-cage, and villin) and successfully sampled their native states. To confirm how the selections of initial structures affected conformational sampling efficiency, numbers of base sets for characterizing structural dissimilarity of initial structures were addressed in distinct trials of SDS. The parameter searches showed that the conformational sampling efficiency was relatively insensitive with respect to the numbers of base sets, indicating the robustness of SDS for actual applications.

A Conformational Search Method for Protein Systems Using Genetic Crossover and Metropolis Criterion

CGLFold: a contact-assisted <i>de novo</i> protein structure prediction using global exploration and loop perturbation sampling algorithm

A Comparative Study on Single and Multiple Point Crossovers in a Genetic Algorithm for Coarse Protein Modeling

Mapping transiently formed and sparsely populated conformations on a complex energy landscape

Protein Conformational Transitions from All-Atom Adaptively Biased Path Optimization

ConfGen: A Conformational Search Method for Efficient Generation of Bioactive Conformers

First-principles molecular structure search with a genetic algorithm

Guided macro-mutation in a graded energy based genetic algorithm for protein structure prediction

Efficiently Explore The Energy Landscape Of Proteins In Molecular Dynamics Simulations By Amplifying Collective Motions

Efficient Conformational Search Based on Structural Dissimilarity Sampling: Applications for Reproducing Structural Transitions of Proteins.

Cyndi: a Multi-Objective Evolution Algorithm Based Method for Bioactive Molecular Conformational Generation

A Hybrid Local Search for Simplified Protein Structure Prediction

Identifying a Feasible Transition Pathway between Two Conformational States for a Protein

A Deterministic Optimization Approach to Protein Sequence Design Using Continuous Models

Conformational Analysis of Peptides Using Monte Carlo Simulations Combined with the Genetic Algorithm

Bioactive Conformational Generation of Small Molecules: A Comparative Analysis Between Force-Field and Multiple Empirical Criteria Based Methods

Functional protein mining with conformal guarantees

A multi-objective evolutionary approach to the protein structure prediction problem

An optimization algorithm for conformer generation based on the bond contribution ranking

Revealing divergent evolution, identifying circular permutations and detecting active-sites by protein structure comparison