Proving Looping and Non-Looping Non-Termination by Finite Automata

Jörg Endrullis,Hans Zantema

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.00478

2015-05-04

Abstract:A new technique is presented to prove non-termination of term rewriting. The basic idea is to find a non-empty regular language of terms that is closed under rewriting and does not contain normal forms. It is automated by representing the language by a tree automaton with a fixed number of states, and expressing the mentioned requirements in a SAT formula. Satisfiability of this formula implies non-termination. Our approach succeeds for many examples where all earlier techniques fail, for instance for the S-rule from combinatory logic.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to automatically prove the non - termination of term rewriting systems, especially those systems that cannot be proven by existing techniques (such as loop or extended loop patterns)**. Specifically, the author proposes a new technique based on finite automata to prove the non - termination of term rewriting systems.

### Problem Background

Term Rewriting Systems (TRS) are widely used in computer science and mathematical logic. Whether a TRS terminates (i.e., there is no infinite rewriting sequence) is an important property. However, many TRS are non - terminating, and existing techniques (such as finding loop patterns or extended loop patterns) cannot prove the non - termination of these systems.

### Core Problems of the Paper

1. **Proving Non - termination**: Existing techniques (such as finding loop patterns) can only handle specific types of non - termination, and the non - termination of many TRS does not conform to these patterns. For example, the S - rule in combinatorial logic (\( a(a(a(S,x),y),z) \rightarrow a(a(x,z),a(y,z)) \)) is a typical example. Although it has only one rule and is orthogonal, it is very difficult to prove its non - termination.

2. **Automated Proof**: Develop a method that can automatically prove the non - termination of TRS, especially for those complex systems that do not follow the conventional patterns.

### Proposed Solution

The author proposes a new technique based on finite tree automata. The core idea of this technique is:

- **Find a non - empty regular language**: This language is closed under rewriting and does not contain normal forms (i.e., terms that cannot be rewritten any more).
- **Express requirements with SAT formulas**: Encode the above requirements (non - emptiness, closure, and no normal forms) into Boolean satisfiability problems (SAT), and automatically search for suitable finite tree automata through SAT solvers.

### Technical Details

1. **Sufficient Conditions for Non - termination**: If there exists a non - empty language \( L \subseteq T \) that is closed under rewriting and does not contain normal forms, then the TRS is non - terminating.

2. **Use of Finite Tree Automata**: By constructing a finite tree automaton \( A \) such that \( L(A) \) satisfies the above conditions. Specific steps include:
- Ensure that \( L(A) \) does not contain normal forms.
- Ensure that \( L(A) \) is closed under rewriting.
- Ensure that \( L(A) \) is non - empty.

3. **SAT Encoding**: Encode these conditions into SAT formulas and use SAT solvers to solve them.

### Application Examples

This technique has been successfully applied to many examples that previous methods could not handle, including the S - rule in combinatorial logic. Through this method, the author can automatically prove the non - termination of these systems.

### Summary

The main contribution of this paper is to provide a new, automated method to prove the non - termination of term rewriting systems, especially those complex systems that do not conform to the conventional patterns. This method not only extends the application range of existing techniques but also provides a powerful tool for automated reasoning and formal verification.