The local symbol complex of a Reciprocity Functor

Evangelia Gazaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/akt.2016.1.317
2015-08-12
Abstract:For a reciprocity functor $\mathcal{M}$ we consider the local symbol complex $\mathcal{M}\otimes^{M}\mathbb{G}_{m}(\eta_{C})\to\oplus_{P\in C}\mathcal{M}(k)\to\mathcal{M}(k)$, where $C$ is a smooth complete curve over an algebraically closed field $k$ with generic point $\eta_{C}$ and $\otimes^{M}$ is the product of Mackey functors. We prove that if $\mathcal{M}$ satisfies certain conditions, then the homology of the above complex is isomorphic to the $K$-group of reciprocity functors $T(\mathcal{M},\underline{CH}_{0}(C)^{0})(Spec k)$.
Number Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the **description of the homology group of the local symbol complex of the reciprocity functor**. Specifically, the author attempts to prove that under certain assumptions, the homology group of this local symbol complex is isomorphic to the K - group of reciprocity functors. ### Problem Background The paper mainly discusses the local symbol complex on a smooth complete curve \(C\): \[ (M \otimes_M G_m)(\eta_C) \to \bigoplus_{P \in C} M(k) \to M(k), \] where \(C\) is a smooth complete curve defined on an algebraically closed field \(k\), \(\eta_C\) is the generic point of \(C\), and \(\otimes_M\) represents the product of Mackey functors. ### Main Objective The author's main objective is to prove that if the reciprocity functor \(M\) satisfies certain assumptions, then the homology group \(H(C)\) of the above - mentioned local symbol complex is isomorphic to the K - group \(T(M, CH_0(C)^0)(\text{Spec }k)\) of the reciprocity functor. Here \(CH_0(C)^0\) is a reciprocity functor that coincides with the Jacobian variety of \(C\). ### Specific Problem Description 1. **Description of Homology Group**: The author hopes to find the specific form of the homology group \(H(C)\) of the local symbol complex \((C)\). 2. **Isomorphism Relationship**: The author needs to prove that under specific assumptions, \(H(C)\) is isomorphic to \(T(M, CH_0(C)^0)(\text{Spec }k)\). ### Solution Method To achieve this goal, the author introduces two key assumptions (Assumption 3.3 and Assumption 3.10) and uses these assumptions to construct an isomorphism mapping between the homology group and the K - group. Specific steps include: - Define the local symbol \((.;.)_P\) and study its properties. - Construct mappings \(\Phi\) and \(\Psi\) from the local symbol complex to the K - group and prove that they are isomorphism mappings. - Verify that these mappings are indeed isomorphisms when the assumptions are satisfied. ### Conclusion Finally, the author proves that under the assumptions, the homology group \(H(C)\) of the local symbol complex is indeed isomorphic to the K - group \(T(M, CH_0(C)^0)(\text{Spec }k)\) of the reciprocity functor. This provides a new perspective for understanding the structure of reciprocity functors and their applications in algebraic geometry. ### Formula Summary - Local Symbol Complex: \[ (M \otimes_M G_m)(\eta_C) \to \bigoplus_{P \in C} M(k) \to M(k) \] - K - group: \[ T(M, CH_0(C)^0)(\text{Spec }k) \] Through these formulas and assumptions, the author successfully describes the homology group of the local symbol complex and proves its isomorphism relationship with the K - group.