Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Patients Under and Over 70 Years of Age: A Propensity Score- Matched Analysis
Kristian Efremov,Evan A. Glass,Daniel P. Swanson,Adam R. Bowler,Kiet Le,Jacob M. Kirsch,Andrew Jawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.022
IF: 3.507
2024-01-13
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Abstract:Introduction As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continues to grow in popularity for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff, it becomes increasingly important to identify factors that influence postoperative outcome. Although recent studies have demonstrated excellent postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcome scores following RSA for GHOA, there continues to be surgeon hesitation to adopt RSA as a viable treatment in the younger patient population due to greater functional demands. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of age on clinical outcomes following RSA for GHOA through a comparison of patients over and under the age of 70. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from an institutional registry was performed. Propensity score matching was utilized to match patients under the age of 70 (U-70) to those over 70 (O-70) in a 1:1 ratio based on sex, body mass index, preoperative ASES score, preoperative active forward elevation (FE), Walch classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity score. Clinical outcomes obtained preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively consisted of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, as well as active (FE), internal rotation, and external rotation. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to compare cohorts. Results After matching, each cohort consisted of 66 patients with similar mean follow-up periods (U-70, 28.1±7.5 months versus O-70, 27.4±7.5 months; P=.887). Mean age of the U-70 cohort was 66.2±3.3 while the O-70 cohort had a mean age of 75.3±3.8. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in VAS, SANE, and ASES scores, as well as active range of motion in all planes. The only significant difference between cohorts was greater postoperative FE in younger patients (143±16° versus 136±15°; P=.017), though the baseline-to-postoperative improvement in FE was similar between cohorts (50±29° versus 43±29°, P=.174). Conclusion RSA is a successful surgical treatment for GHOA regardless of age. Aside from greater postoperative FE in younger patients, there were no other differences in clinical outcomes between younger and older patients in this retrospective analysis, which compared patients who were matched by sex, BMI, and Walch classification, among other factors. Based on our results, 70 years of age should not be used as a threshold in preoperative counseling when determining whether a patient with GHOA with an intact rotator cuff is indicated for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences