The concept "altruism" for sociological research: from conceptualization to operationalization

Oleg V. Pavenkov,Vladimir G. Pavenkov,Mariia V. Rubtcova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.01258
2015-03-04
Abstract:This article addresses the question of the relevant conceptualization of «altruism» in Russian from the perspective sociological research operationalization. It investigates the spheres of social application of the word «altruism», include Russian equivalent «vzaimopomoshh`» (mutual help). The data for the study comes from Russian National Corpus (Russian). The theoretical framework consists of Paul F. Lazarsfeld`s Theory of Sociological Research Methodology and the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM). Quantitative analysis shows features in the representation of altruism in Russian that sociologists need to know in the preparation of questionnaires, interview guides and analysis of transcripts.
Computers and Society,Computation and Language
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the conceptualization and operationalization of the concept of "altruism" in Russian sociological research. Specifically, the author explores the usage of "altruism" and its Russian synonym "vzaimopomoshh`" in different social application fields, and whether there are significant differences in the usage of these two words in spoken and written languages. ### Main research questions: 1. **Can "altruism" and "vzaimopomoshh`" be used interchangeably?** 2. **Are there essential differences between these two words in spoken and written languages?** ### Research methods: - **Data sources**: Russian National Corpus. - **Theoretical framework**: Paul F. Lazarsfeld's sociological research methodology and Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM). - **Quantitative analysis**: Verify hypotheses through statistical tests (such as chi - square test and Cramer's V). ### Research results: - **Usage fields**: There are significant differences between "altruism" and "vzaimopomoshh`" in different social application fields (such as human behavior, quality of interpersonal relationships, social institutions, etc.). - **Spoken and written languages**: There are no statistically significant differences in the usage of the two words in spoken and written languages, but their usage frequencies are different in some specific contexts. ### Conclusions: - "Altruism" and "vzaimopomoshh`" cannot be used interchangeably in most cases, especially when describing the behaviors of social institutions and at the national level. - These findings are of great significance for questionnaire design, interview guide compilation and transcription analysis in sociological research, which helps to avoid conceptual confusion and improve the accuracy of research. ### Future research directions: - Increase the sociological interview records in the Russian National Corpus. - Explore the differences in the usage of these terms by different social groups. - Re - examine the definitions and applications of these concepts. Through these studies, the author hopes to provide more precise conceptual operationalization tools for sociological research, thereby improving the reliability and effectiveness of research.