Abstract:This paper draws on household survey data to assess carbon footprint inequality and analyze its driving forces. Most existing literature assesses carbon footprint inequality on a more macro level using aggregated residential expenditure data of each income group, ignoring individual difference that may result in social inequality and decrease of social welfare. In order to overcome this problem, this paper integrates an Environmentally Extended Input–Output model and a Consumer Lifestyle Approach to assess individual carbon footprint. The analysis adopts both micro level household survey data and the estimation of macro level consumption-based carbon intensity.The micro level household survey data used in this paper include: 1) Chinese Urban Household Survey (UHS), covering urban household data from 2002 to 2009 with 127,234 samples in total; 2) Chinese Household Income Project Survey (CHIP), covering rural, urban as well as migrating population in year 2002, 2007 and 2013; 3) and China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), covering both rural and urban data in years 2011 and 2013.The driving forces of carbon footprint inequality are studied using regression models at both household and per capita levels with detailed consideration of: 1) demographic characteristics like gender, age, family size, elder people rate, and children rate; 2) financial characteristics like disposable income, housing ownership, and vehicle ownership; 3) controlled factors like year, province and urban identity, as well as other variables of interest.The main findings of this study reveal that: 1) carbon inequality widely exists at both household level and individual level, and the main contributing factors are urban-rural differences, income disparities, education inequalities as well as living condition differences. An inverted U-shaped curve exists between household carbon footprint and the age of the household head, and household carbon emission peaks when the household head is between his (her) 40s and 50s. Family living conditions significantly affect the family’s carbon footprint, carbon footprint of residents living in bungalows or smaller houses are significantly lower than that of others. Households that prefer service-oriented and one-time expenditure emit more carbon emissions. 2) The urban-rural duality has great impact on the carbon footprint inequality. The carbon footprint of rural residents is generally 20%-50% lower than that of urban residents. The aggravating of population ageing and urban-rural dichotomy may further exacerbate carbon footprint inequality among residents. 3) Inequality of carbon footprint is higher than that of income and expenditure, and serious for rural residents comparing to that for urban residents and migrants. 4) While carbon footprint inequality has slightly declined on overall level and within-group level respectively for urban, rural and migrating residents; between-group inequality has been increasing, which may become an important source of future carbon footprint inequality.As for policy implication, this analysis indicates that: 1) reducing the income gap between urban and rural residents improves carbon footprint equity; 2) encouraging energy-saving lifestyle contributes to carbon emission reduction through the decrease of service-oriented and one-time expenditure.

Socioeconomic inequalities in greenhouse gas emissions from household travel in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Policy approaches to decarbonising the transport sector in Aotearoa New Zealand: modelling equity, population health, and health-system effects

Quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions of New Zealand households' food purchases: An analysis by sociodemographic variables

Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020

Personal Mobility Choices and Disparities in Carbon Emissions

Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here?

Investigating the link between carbon dioxide emissions and transport-related social exclusion in rural Northern Ireland

Associations of health, physical activity and weight status with motorised travel and transport carbon dioxide emissions: a cross-sectional, observational study

'Green' on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel

Unequal 'drivers': On the inequality of mobility emissions in Germany

Satisfying transport needs with low carbon emissions: Exploring individual, social, and built environmental factors

Impact of net zero policy scenarios on air pollution inequalities in England and Wales

Micro-stories and the lived experience of transport poverty: Lessons from Iceland for just mobility transitions

Travel-Related Exposure To Air Pollution And Its Socio-Environmental Inequalities: Evidence From A Week-Long Gps-Based Travel Diary Dataset

An investigation of inequalities in exposure to PM2.5 air pollution across small areas in Ireland

Understanding the Challenge of Decoupling Transport-Related CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth in Developing Countries

Carbon Footprint Inequality and Its Driving Forces: Evidence from Chinese Household Survey Data

Examining the Uneven Distribution of Household Travel Carbon Emissions Within and Across Neighborhoods: the Case of Beijing

Community inequality and smoking cessation in New Zealand, 1981-2006

Factors driving reduction in CO2 emissions from personal travel: A repeated cross-sectional analysis

Social cost of household emissions: cross-country comparison across the economic development spectrum