Abstract:Introduction The importance of meaningfully involving patients and the public in digital health innovation is widely acknowledged, but often poorly understood. This review, therefore, sought to explore how patients and the public are involved in digital health innovation and to identify factors that support and inhibit meaningful patient and public involvement (PPI) in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation. Methods Searches were undertaken from 2010 to July 2020 in the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and ACM Digital Library. Grey literature searches were also undertaken using the Patient Experience Library database and Google Scholar. Results Of the 10,540 articles identified, 433 were included. The majority of included articles were published in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, with representation from 42 countries highlighting the international relevance of PPI in digital health. 112 topic areas where PPI had reportedly taken place were identified. Areas most often described included cancer (n = 50), mental health (n = 43), diabetes (n = 26) and long‐term conditions (n = 19). Interestingly, over 133 terms were used to describe PPI; few were explicitly defined. Patients were often most involved in the final, passive stages of an innovation journey, for example, usability testing, where the ability to proactively influence change was severely limited. Common barriers to achieving meaningful PPI included data privacy and security concerns, not involving patients early enough and lack of trust. Suggested enablers were often designed to counteract such challenges. Conclusions PPI is largely viewed as valuable and essential in digital health innovation, but rarely practised. Several barriers exist for both innovators and patients, which currently limits the quality, frequency and duration of PPI in digital health innovation, although improvements have been made in the past decade. Some reported barriers and enablers such as the importance of data privacy and security appear to be unique to PPI in digital innovation. Greater efforts should be made to support innovators and patients to become meaningfully involved in digital health innovations from the outset, given its reported benefits and impacts. Stakeholder consensus on the principles that underpin meaningful PPI in digital health innovation would be helpful in providing evidence‐based guidance on how to achieve this. Patient or Public Contribution This review has received extensive patient and public contributions with a representative from the Patient Experience Library involved throughout the review's conception, from design (including suggested revisions to the search strategy) through to article production and dissemination. Other areas of patient and public contributor involvement include contributing to the inductive thematic analysis process, refining the thematic framework and finalizing theme wording, helping to ensure relevance, value and meaning from a patient perspective. Findings from this review have also been presented to a variety of stakeholders including patients, patient advocates and clinicians through a series of focus groups and webinars. Given their extensive involvement, the representative from the Patient Experience Library is rightly included as an author of this review.

Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research

Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

Patient and public involvement in emergency care research: a scoping review of the literature

Interpretation of reporting guidance for research involvement of patients and the public (GRIPP 2)

Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study

Patient and public involvement in healthcare: a systematic mapping review of systematic reviews - identification of current research and possible directions for future research

Patient and Public Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Frequency, Determinants, Stages, Barriers, and Dissemination

A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research

A blueprint for patient and public involvement in the development of a reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis

Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling initiatives in health and social services: A scoping review

Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention

Toward learning from patient safety reporting systems

Systematic Review: Patient and Public Involvement of Children and Young People in Mental Health Research

Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review

Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Learning Guidelines Implemented by Health Care Professionals in Specialized Care Units: Scoping Review

The Reporting of Safety among Drug Systematic Reviews Was Poor Before the Implementation of the PRISMA Harms Checklist.

Questionnaires measuring patient participation in patient safety-A systematic review

Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement