Abstract:Optimal control is seen by researchers from a different perspective than that from which the industry practitioners see it. Either type of user can easily become confounded when deciding which manner of optimal control should be used for guidance and control of mechanics. Such optimization methods are useful for autonomous navigation, guidance, and control, but their performance is hampered by noisy multi-sensor technologies and poorly modeled system equations, and real-time on-board utilization is generally computationally burdensome. Some methods proposed here use noisy sensor data to learn the optimal guidance and control solutions in real-time (online), where non-iterative instantiations are preferred to reduce computational burdens. This study aimed to highlight the efficacy and limitations of several common methods for optimizing guidance and control while proposing a few more, where all methods are applied to the full, nonlinear, coupled equations of motion including cross-products of motion from the transport theorem. While the reviewed literature introduces quantitative studies that include parametric uncertainty in nonlinear terms, this article proposes accommodating such uncertainty with time-varying solutions to Hamiltonian systems of equations solved in real-time. Five disparate types of optimum guidance and control algorithms are presented and compared to a classical benchmark. Comparative analysis is based on tracking errors (both states and rates), fuel usage, and computational burden. Real-time optimization with singular switching plus nonlinear transport theorem decoupling is newly introduced and proves superior by matching open-loop solutions to the constrained optimization problem (in terms of state and rate errors and fuel usage), while robustness is validated in the utilization of mixed, noisy state and rate sensors and uniformly varying mass and mass moments of inertia. Compared to benchmark, state-of-the-art methods state tracking errors are reduced one-hundred ten percent. Rate tracking errors are reduced one-hundred thirteen percent. Control utilization (fuel) is reduced eighty-four percent, while computational burden is reduced ten percent, simultaneously, where the proposed methods have no control gains and no linearization.

Accelerated Newton-Raphson GRAPE methods for optimal control

Modified Newton-Raphson GRAPE methods for optimal control of spin systems

Accelerating Quantum Optimal Control Through Iterative Gradient-Ascent Pulse Engineering

Time Scaling Transformation In Quantum Optimal Control Computation

GRAPE optimization for open quantum systems with time-dependent decoherence rates driven by coherent and incoherent controls

Iterative Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering algorithm for quantum optimal control

A Novel Adaptive Gauss Pseudospectral Method for Nonlinear Optimal Control of Constrained Hypersonic Re‐entry Vehicle Problem

Optimal control of large quantum systems: assessing memory and runtime performance of GRAPE

Output stabilization of boundary-controlled parabolic PDEs via gradient-based dynamic optimization

Data-driven Gradient Algorithm for High-Precision Quantum Control

Reducing Memory Requirements of Quantum Optimal Control

Incoherent GRAPE (inGRAPE) for optimization of quantum systems with environmentally assisted control

Hopf-type representation formulas and efficient algorithms for certain high-dimensional optimal control problems

A Primal-Dual Method for Optimal Control and Trajectory Generation in High-Dimensional Systems

Lax-Oleinik-Type Formulas and Efficient Algorithms for Certain High-Dimensional Optimal Control Problems

A Computationally Efficient Hamilton-Jacobi-based Formula for State-Constrained Optimal Control Problems

Optimal control of nonlinear system based on deterministic policy gradient with eligibility traces

Treatise on Analytic Nonlinear Optimal Guidance and Control Amplification of Strictly Analytic (Non-Numerical) Methods

A Numerical Approach to Optimal Coherent Quantum LQG Controller Design Using Gradient Descent

Pulse Engineering via Projection of Response Functions

EO-GRAPE and EO-DRLPE: Open and Closed Loop Approaches for Energy Efficient Quantum Optimal Control