Abstract:Aim This study aimed to evaluate the combination of virtual simulation and in-person simulation among undergraduate nursing students. Background At present, in-person simulation is the main form of simulation in China. With the development of computer technology, computer-based virtual simulation is gradually applied in simulation and has shown unique advantages. However, simulation format that combines virtual simulation with in-person simulation is rare in China. Design This was a mixed methods study, which applied a QUAN→qual sequential explanatory approach. Methods In the quantitative phase, a non-randomized controlled trial (NRCT) was employed among 93 junior undergraduate nursing students from nursing school of a university in China. Students from parallel classes 1, 2 and 3 (45 students) were selected as experimental group, while students from parallel classes 4, 5 and 6 (48 students) were selected as control group. The control group completed the in-person simulation, while the experimental group was required to complete both virtual simulation and in-person simulation. The students' performance in in-person simulation was evaluated by the teachers according to a demonstrating checklist. After simulation, Students were invited to answer the Students' Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning Scale (SSS), Educational Practices in Simulation Scale (EPSS) and Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey (CLECS). A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in qualitative phase. Ten students were recruited by a purposive sampling method from the experimental group and were interviewed by the researcher. A semi-structured interview method was used to conduct in-depth interviews with them. Results The mean score of the students' performance in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (63.00 vs 57.67). There were no significant differences in learning satisfaction, self-confidence and simulated practice score (except cooperation dimension) between the two groups (P>0.05). For experimental group, the total CLECS score in in-person simulation was higher than that in virtual simulation, which was 84.98±12.50 and 72.58±13.04 respectively and the difference was statistically significant (t=5.270, p<0.001). Ten students were interviewed in the qualitative phase. Through the interview, we have learned that students believed that virtual simulation combined with in-person simulation is helpful to enhance their knowledge, improve their learning confidence and help them develop non-technical skills (i.e., decision-making and critical thinking). Conclusion In-person simulation is the preferred form of simulation and virtual simulation is a beneficial supplement to in-person simulation. The combination of the two is suggested to be introduced into the simulation curriculum for undergraduate nursing students.

Multi-Modal Simulation to Prepare Final Year Nursing Students for Transition to Clinical Practice: A Mixed Methods Study

Enhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study

Effects of Standardized Patient Simulation and Mobile Applications on Nursing Students' Clinical Competence, Self-Efficacy, and Cultural Competence: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Three learning modalities' impact on clinical judgment and perceptions in newly graduated registered nurses: A quasi-experimental study

Nursing Student Perception of Different Simulation Methodologies Applied to Help First-Year Students Integrate Knowledge Acquired: A Cross-Sectional Study

Efficacy of Simulation Using NLN/Jeffries Nursing Education Simulation Framework on Satisfaction and Self-Confidence of Undergraduate Nursing Students in a Middle-Eastern Country

Student Nurses' Perceptions of the Role of High-Fidelity Simulation in Developing Decision-Making Skills for Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Research Study

Learning effects of virtual versus high-fidelity simulations in nursing students: a crossover comparison

Clinical judgment, person-centered care and professionalism: A transmodal ordered network analysis of student performance in virtual patient simulations

Nursing students' perspectives and learning experiences of participating in a palliative and end-of-life care simulation programme: A qualitative study

Evaluation of a psychological readiness program and final clinical practicum among final year nursing students: A mixed methods study

Development and evaluation of a clinical simulation for new graduate nurses: A multi-site pilot study

Effectiveness of multiple scenario simulations of acute and critical care for undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental design

Nursing students' perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study

Using Simulation to Develop Clinical Judgment in Undergraduate Nursing Students

A Qualitative Study on the Experiences of Preclinical Students in Learning Clinical and Communication Skills at a Simulation Centre

Evaluation of the Combination of Virtual Simulation and in-person simulation among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed Methods Study

Improvements in practising nurses’ knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, confidence, and satisfaction after a simulated clinical experience of caring for a patient undergoing chemotherapy: a quasi-experimental study

Responding to patient deterioration from simulation to practice: A narrative study of undergraduate nursing students

Does simulation lab increase confidence in Occupational Therapy Students' clinical skills: A pilot study

Developing Clinical Judgment During Transition to Practice With Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice Simulation