Equitable and adversarial pricing for items under warranty

N. Singpurwalla,Byeon Joon Seung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/LPR/MGI002

2005-03-01

Abstract:Most manufactured goods entail the involvement of three parties, a manufacturer, an intermediary and a customer. Usually, the manufacturer warranties his/her product against defects to the intermediary, who in turn extends this warranty to the customer. Here, we consider the manufacturer's warranty to the intermediary providing the free replenishment of failed items within a specific period. Specifically, we focus on the matter of how manufacturer and intermediary arrive upon a unit price per item that the manufacturer can levy against the intermediary. First, we discuss two equitable scenarios; one in which both manufacturer and intermediary strive for fairness with a common probability distribution about the number of unit failures within a prescribed warranty period, and the other wherein manufacturer and intermediary have different distributions, but they arrive upon a consensus by a process of co-operation. Then, we discuss the adversarial scenario wherein each strives to maximize his/her expected utility without knowledge of the other's utilities and without using a common distribution. This latter scenario is perhaps the more realistic one, in the sense of what is done in practice. However, a discussion of the equitable scenario may be useful in matters of litigation pertaining to warranty claims and violations.