Should a retailer sell its own extended warranties or resell those from the manufacturer when confronting supplier encroachment?

Junwu Chai,Hengyu Li,Wei Yan,Youwei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1759383

IF: 3.6

2020-07-02

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract:Due to fierce competition in the product market under conditions of supplier encroachment, many brand name retailers, including Sears, Best Buy, and Circuit City, depend on the extended warranty contracts that they sell along with the products. The distribution of extended warranties through an intermediary can be characterized in terms of two basic forms. A large proportion of retailers sell their own extended warranty, whilst others choose to resell the extended warranty provided by upstream agents. Several questions arise from these conditions. How will optimum decisions vary under different strategic choice? Is it profitable for a retailer to engage in selling extended warranties? And finally, which strategy is more profitable for related players? We answer these questions using a game theoretic model where the retailer has the flexibility to choose between offering its own extended warranties (Model ER) or reselling extended warranties provided by a manufacturer (Model EM). Our analysis reveals that it is indeed a profitable business for both parties when the retailer engages in selling extended warranty, irrespective of whether they are owned by the retailer or by the manufacturer. Surprisingly, we find that, when marketing cost of the extended warranty is high, the retailer benefits more from reselling the extended warranty, a strategy that is always beneficial for the manufacturer. Put differently, when marketing cost of the extended warranty is high, reselling extended warranties from the manufacturer can secure Pareto improvements. However, when marketing cost of the extended warranty is not pronounced, a preference confliction arises between both parties: The retailer prefers to sell its own extended warranty, while the manufacturer would be fond of the other one. Extending both models to the case where the manufacturer encroaches into retail market with selling both products and extended warranty reveals that the preference confliction between both parties is quite robust.

management,operations research & management science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is, in the case of supplier intrusion into the market, whether the retailer should sell its own extended - warranty service or resell the extended - warranty service provided by the manufacturer. Specifically, the article explores the following aspects:

1. **How does the optimal decision change**: Under different strategic choices, that is, when the retailer chooses to provide its own extended - warranty service (Model ER) or resell the extended - warranty service provided by the manufacturer (Model EM), how will the optimal decision change?
2. **Is selling extended - warranty profitable**: For the retailer, is participating in the sale of extended - warranty a profitable business?
3. **Which strategy is more beneficial to the relevant parties**: For the manufacturer and the retailer, which strategy is more advantageous?

By establishing a game - theory model, the author analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two strategies under different conditions (such as high or low marketing costs of extended - warranty) and draws the following main conclusions:

- When the marketing cost of extended - warranty is high, reselling the extended - warranty provided by the manufacturer is more beneficial to the retailer and is also always beneficial to the manufacturer.
- When the marketing cost of extended - warranty is not high, there is a strategic conflict between the retailer and the manufacturer: the retailer tends to sell its own extended - warranty, while the manufacturer tends to let the retailer resell the extended - warranty it provides.
- Overall, whether the extended - warranty is provided by the retailer or the manufacturer, selling extended - warranty is a profitable business.

These conclusions are helpful for understanding how retailers and manufacturers formulate optimal extended - warranty strategies to maximize their respective profits in the case of supplier intrusion into the market.