Abstract:We compare two strategies of multidetector detection of compact binary inspiral signals, namely, the coincidence and the coherent for the realistic case of geographically separated detectors. The naive coincident strategy treats the detectors as if they are isolated—compares individual detector statistics with their respective thresholds while the coherent strategy combines the detector network data coherently to obtain a single detection statistic which is then compared with a single threshold. We also consider an enhanced coincidence strategy which is intermediate in the sense that though the individual statistics are added in quadrature and the sum compared with a single threshold, the estimated parameters are also checked for consistency. For simplicity, we consider detector pairs having the same power spectral density of noise, as that of initial LIGO and also assume the noise to be stationary and Gaussian. Further, since we consider the detectors to be widely separated on Earth, we take the instrumental noises to be uncorrelated; the wide separation implicitly means that since the detector arms must lie parallel to the Earth’s surface, the detectors necessarily have different orientations. We compare the performances of the methods by plotting the receiver operating characteristics for the strategies. Several results are derived analytically in order to gain insight. Simulations are performed in order to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A single astrophysical source as well as a distribution of sources is considered. We assume a 1 yr data train and a mass range of 1–40M⊙ for the case of astrophysically distributed sources. We find that the coherent strategy is superior to the two coincident strategies that we consider. Remarkably, the detection probability of the coherent strategy is 50% better than the naive coincident strategy. One the other hand, the difference in performance between the coherent strategy and enhanced coincident strategy is not very large. Even in this situation, it is not difficult to perform the real data analysis with the coherent strategy. The bottom line is that the coherent strategy is a good detection strategy.

Identifying multichannel coherent couplings and causal relationships in gravitational wave detectors

Coherent versus coincidence detection of gravitational wave signals from compact inspiraling binaries

Identifying noise transients in gravitational-wave data arising from nonlinear couplings

Gravitational-wave geodesy: Defining false alarm probabilities with respect to correlated noise

Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of geographically separated detectors: Coherent versus coincident strategies

Detecting a stochastic gravitational-wave background in the presence of correlated magnetic noise

The Potential Impact of Noise Correlation in Next-generation Gravitational Wave Detectors

Data analysis strategies for the detection of gravitational waves in non-Gaussian noise

Variational inference for correlated gravitational wave detector network noise

Calibrating signal-to-noise ratio detection thresholds using gravitational-wave catalogs

Detector Characterization and Mitigation of Noise in Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Interferometers

Detection in coincidence of gravitational wave bursts with a network of interferometric detectors (I): Geometric acceptance and timing

Calibrating gravitational-wave search algorithms with conformal prediction

Dynamic Normalization for Compact Binary Coalescence Searches in Non-Stationary Noise

Impact of combinations of time-delay interferometry channels on stochastic gravitational wave background detection

Comparative study of 1D and 2D convolutional neural network models with attribution analysis for gravitational wave detection from compact binary coalescences

Gravitational-Wave Geodesy: A New Tool for Validating Detection of the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

Classification methods for noise transients in advanced gravitational-wave detectors

Convolutional Neural Networks for signal detection in real LIGO data

Distinguishing a stochastic gravitational-wave signal from correlated noise with joint parameter estimation: Fisher analysis for ground-based detectors