Abstract:Background: Criminal defendants may often exaggerate psychiatric symptoms either to appear non-accountable for their actions or to mitigate their imprisonment. Several psychometric tests have been proposed to detect malingering. These instruments are often validated by Simulation Design (SD) protocols, where normal participants are explicitly requested to either simulate a mental disorder or respond honestly. However, the real scenarios (clinical or forensic) are often very challenging because of the presence of genuine patients, so that tests accuracy frequently differs from that one obtained in well-controlled experimental settings. Here we assessed the effectiveness in criminal defendants of three well-known malingering-detecting tests (MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM) by using both Known-Group Comparison (KGC) and Simulation Design (SD) protocols. Methods: The study involved 151 male inmates. Participants to the KGC protocol were all characterized by a positive psychiatric history. They were considered as genuine patients (KGC_Controls) if they had some psychiatric disorders already before imprisonment and scored above the cutoff of SCL-90-R, a commonly used test for mental illness, and as suspected malingerers (KGC_SM) if they were diagnosed as psychiatric patients only after imprisonment and scored below the SCL-90-R cutoff. Participants to SD protocol had no history of psychiatric disease and scored below the SCL-90-R cutoff. They were randomly assigned to either group: Controls (requested to answer honestly, SD_Controls) and simulated malingerers (requested to feign a psychiatric disease, SD_SM). All participants were then submitted to MMPI-2, NIM and SIMS. Results: Results showed that while MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM were all effective in discriminating malingerers in the SD, SIMS only significantly discriminated between KGC_Controls and KGC_SM in the Known-Group Comparison. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves analysis confirmed the better sensitivity of SIMS with respect to the other tests but raised some issues on SIMS specificity. Discussion: Results support the sensitivity of SIMS for the detection of malingering in forensic populations. However, some specificity issues emerged suggesting that further research and a good forensic practice should keep into account multiple measures of malingering, including psychometric data, clinical and social history and current clinical situation. These methodological constraints must be kept in mind during detection of malingering in criminal defendants reporting psychiatric symptoms.

Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting

Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain

Cross-Validation of Supplemental Test of Memory Malingering Scores as Performance Validity Measures

Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests

Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM

The Association Between TOMM40 Gene Polymorphism and Spontaneous Brain Activity in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury

Malingering assessment after severe traumatic brain injury in forensic psychology with a potential embedded symptom validity indicator of Symptom Checklist 90

A preliminary examination of the TOMM2 in a sample of Spanish speakers in the United States

Criminal behaviors: A theory of mind problem?

Applying the German Version of the TOMMORROW Neuropsychological Assessment Battery for the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Clinical and Research Settings

Sensory and Cognitive Malingering: Studies and Tests

What are the chances? – Validity assessment and the cumulative binomial distribution in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial

Using the MMPI-2-RF to Characterize Defendants Evaluated for Competency to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility

Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words

Dissimulation in forensic psychiatric evaluations, a case-control study of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III

Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT)

Multidimensional Malingering Criteria for Neuropsychological Assessment: A 20-Year Update of the Malingered Neuropsychological Dysfunction Criteria

Test Your Memory (TYM) and Test Your Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment (TYM-MCI): A Review and Update Including Results of Using the TYM Test in a General Neurology Clinic and Using a Telephone Version of the TYM Test

Successful use of the forced choice test for detecting concealment of semantic memory in criminal and intelligence investigations

Recall and recognition of similarities items in neuropsychological assessment: Memory, validity, and meaning