Abstract:Public-Private-Partnerships (PPPs), known as 3Ps in the US and Canada, were introduced in to the United Kingdom (UK) by the Conservative government in their 1992. Since then, PPPs in the UK accounted for over 57 billion pounds worth of capital expenditure. The Transport sector, whilst not having signed the most PPP deals, accounted for the largest capital expenditure of all sectors; approximately 12 billion pounds of which urban transit PPPs has accounted for approximately 7 billion pounds. When compared with Europe, US and Canada, the UK has led the way with PPP financing however this model is becoming increasingly more popular in these regions. The application of an innovative PPP funding policy to upgrade London Underground's was shrouded in controversy since its announcement in the House of Commons by the then Labour government in March 1998. After an extended transaction period that resulted in significant transaction costs, three infrastructure contracts were signed in 2002/3. During the operational period of the PPP significant problems began to emerge between London Underground (LU) and its contractors. Four years into the first review period one consortium that was awarded two infrastructure contracts went into administration; and two years later the other consortium reverted back to the public sector operation. In sum the PPP model expected to deliver 15 billion pounds of investment into London Underground's ailing system was abandoned. The aim of this paper is to examine the lessons that can be learnt from the public sector's perspective when applying an innovative PPP model to upgrade LU's infrastructure. This will be achieved by investigating the factors that led to the PPP model being chosen in the first instance; and the series of events that led to its demise with a view to concluding whether it was a failure in the PPP policy or the implementation of the policy.

Competition in the 'body without organs': an assemblage perspective on the UK's fast train (HS2) cancellation

Analysis of the Energy Use of Various High Speed Trains and Comparison with Other Modes of Transport

Infrastructure Pricing: The Case of Airline and High Speed Rail Competition

A Re-examination of the Public-Private-Partnership Discourse: Was PPP the way to Upgrade London Underground’s Infrastructure?

The Transformation of Transport Policy in Great Britain? ‘New Realism’ and New Labour's Decade of Displacement Activity

Survival of the Unfittest: Why the Worst Infrastructure Gets Built, And What We Can Do about It

Social Exclusion and High-Speed Railways: Evidence from China

Comparisons as a discursive tool: shaping megaproject narratives in the United Kingdom

Confronting global infrastructural capitalism: the triple logic of the 'vanguard' and its inevitable spatial and class contradictions in China's high-speed rail program

Political Will and Economic Necessity? The Construction of High-Speed Rail Networks in Portugal and East Germany

Analytical modelling and UK Government policy

Spatial imaginaries and the politics of inter-regional transport infrastructure development in Northern England

Towards a Political Economy of Social Infrastructure: Contesting “Anti‐Social Infrastructures” in London

Power and the politics of infrastructure planning: a case study of the proposed construction of a high-speed rail system in Texas.

Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing

Sensitivity of a High-Speed Rail Development on Supply Chain and Logistics via Air-Rail-Road Freight Transportation

Two national models of infrastructure co-opetition

Perverse Incentives and Invisible Tradeoffs in Subway Construction in China: the Case of Hangzhou Subway Collapse

The problem of homogeneity of rail passenger delay compensation scheme rules in Great Britain: impacts on passenger engagement and operator revenues

The Impact of Institutional Structures on Transport Infrastructure Performance. A Cross-National Comparison on Various Indicators