Abstract:This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the controversy regarding whether superluminal quantum tunneling (SQT) violates causality. Specifically, the author M. Fayngold analyzed several key features in the quantum tunneling process, such as the definition of tunneling time (TT), the frequency range of signals, and the explanation for the so - called superluminal signal transmission observed in the frustrated total internal reflection experiment. The author believes that these so - called superluminal phenomena are actually based on a misunderstanding of the quantum tunneling process, and through a thought experiment similar to the Tolman paradox, shows that attenuation, a new factor, plays an important role in the interaction between the tunneling signal and macroscopic causality.
### Main Problem Points:
1. **Definition of Tunneling Time**:
- The paper discussed different definitions of tunneling time and their relevance. For example, one definition regards tunneling time as the scattering time at the entrance of the potential barrier, while another is based on the expression of wave frequency. The author pointed out that these two definitions are inconsistent, and the latter will lead to physically unacceptable results in some cases, such as the tunneling time tending to infinity or negative values.
2. **Frequency Range of Signals**:
- The author criticized some researchers' view that physical signals must be band - limited. He believes that this view ignores the nature of wave packets in quantum mechanics, that is, even if the frequency band is infinitely wide, the actual signal energy is still finite.
3. **Superluminal Phenomena in the Frustrated Total Internal Reflection Experiment**:
- The paper analyzed the so - called superluminal phenomena observed in the frustrated total internal reflection experiment. The author pointed out that these phenomena are actually caused by multiple scattering processes in the experimental design, rather than real superluminal signal transmission. He emphasized that quantum particles have wave - like properties and will propagate along all possible virtual paths simultaneously, so they cannot be simply interpreted as the movement of classical particles along specific paths.
### Conclusion:
Through detailed physical analysis and mathematical derivation, the author aims to clarify the misunderstandings of superluminal quantum tunneling phenomena and emphasizes that these phenomena do not violate causality in relativity. The core of the paper lies in correcting the wrong interpretations of the quantum tunneling process and providing a more reasonable physical model to explain the experimental observations.