Abstract:The aim of this study was to validate quantitative performance of a newly released simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, by using MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC), both in phantom study and in patient study. PET/MRI image uniformities of a phantom under different hardware configurations were tested and compared. Thirty patients were examined with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and subsequent PET/MRI. PET images from PET/MRI were corrected with MRAC (PETMR), CT-based attenuation maps (μ-maps, PETCT), and segmented CT μ-maps (PETCTSeg) derived from PET/CT. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared among the 3 sets of PET in main organs (bone, liver and lung) and in 52 FDG-avid lesions, including soft-tissue lesions and bone lesions. The result showed that PET imaging uniformities of PET/MRI under different configurations were good (<8.8%). The SUV differences among the 3 sets of PET varied with organs and lesion types. In detail, the mean relative differences of SUV between PETMR and PETCT were as follows: −18.8%, bone (SUVmean); −8.0%, liver (SUVmean); −12.2%, lung (SUVmean); −18.1%, bone lesions (SUVmean); −13.3%, bone lesions (SUVmax); −8.2%, soft-tissue lesions (SUVmean); and −7.3%, soft-tissue lesions (SUVmax). The mean relative differences between PETMR and PETCTSeg were as follows: −19.0%, bone (SUVmean); −3.5%, liver (SUVmean); −3.3%, lung (SUVmean); −19.3%, bone lesions (SUVmean); −17.5%, bone lesions (SUVmax); −5.5%, soft-tissue lesions (SUVmean); and −4.4%, soft-tissue lesions (SUVmax). The differences of SUV between PETMR and PETCT were larger than those between PETMR and PETCTSeg, in both soft tissue and soft-tissue lesions (P<0.001), but not in bone or bone lesions. In conclusion, MRAC in the newly released PET/MR system is accurate in most tissues, with SUV deviations being generally less than 10%, compared to PET/CT. In bone, however, underestimations can be substantial, which may be partially attributed to segmentation of the MR-based μ-maps.

Attenuation correction with Region Growing Method used in the Positron Emission Mammography System

Efficient Segmentation Method Using Quantised and Non‐linear CeNN for Breast Tumour Classification

Automatic Pectoral Muscle Boundary Detection in Mammograms Based on Markov Chain and Active Contour Model

Development of a New Γ-Ray Detector for PEM Applications

Scatter and Attenuation Corrections for A Pem Detector Using List-Mode Osem

Random Correction Method For Positron Emission Mammography Using Delayed Coincidence Data

Optimization PEM designs based on Monte Carlo simulations

EMISTA-Based Quantitative PET Reconstruction.

Preliminary Simulation Studies on A Cylindrical Pem Scanner Using Gate

Performance Comparison of Dual-Head Pem Scanner by Monte Carlo Simulation

Attenuation Correction for Fixed Mr Components in A Simultaneous Pet/Mr System

Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System

Graph-based region growing for mass-segmentation in digital mammography

Thresholding segmentation method for breast region in mammogram based on isosurface

A Novel PET Tumor Delineation Method Based on Adaptive Region-Growing and Dual-Front Active Contours

Semi-automatic segmentation from intrinsically-registered 18F-FDG–PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in a breast cancer cohort: comparison to manual DCE–MRI

Automatic Descending Aorta Segmentation in Whole-Body PET-CT Studies for PERCIST-Based Thresholding

Segmentation of Masses in Mammograms

PeMNet for Pectoral Muscle Segmentation

MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods

Attenuation correction and truncation completion for breast PET/MR imaging using deep learning