Abstract:In many applications such as rationing medical care and supplies, university admissions, and the assignment of public housing, the decision of who receives an allocation can be justified by various normative criteria. Such settings have motivated the following priority-respecting allocation problem: several categories, each with a quota of interchangeable items, wish to allocate the items among a set of agents. Each category has a list of eligible agents and a priority ordering over these agents; agents may be eligible in multiple categories. The goal is to select a valid allocation: one that respects quotas, eligibility, and priorities and ensures Pareto efficiency. We provide an algorithmic characterization of all valid allocations, exhibiting a bijection between sets of agents who can be allocated and maximum-weight matchings under carefully chosen rank-based weights. While prior work provides a polynomial-time algorithm to locate a valid allocation, our characterization admits a simpler algorithm that enables two wide-reaching extensions: 1. Selecting valid allocations that satisfy additional criteria: Via three examples -- inclusion/exclusion of some chosen agent; agent-side Pareto efficiency vs. welfare maximization; and fairness from the perspective of allocated vs. unallocated agents -- we show that finding priority-respecting allocations subject to some secondary constraint straddles a complexity knife-edge; in each example, one problem variant can be solved efficiently, while its variant is NP-hard. 2. Efficiency-envy tradeoffs in dynamic allocation: In settings where allocations must be made to T agents arriving sequentially via some stochastic process, we show that while insisting on zero priority violations leads to an Omega(T) loss in efficiency, one can design allocation policies ensuring that the sum of the efficiency loss and priority violations in hindsight is O(1).

Structure and complexity of ex post efficient random assignments

Probabilistic Analysis for the Random Assignment Problem

ON THE RANDOM N×n ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM

Fairness and efficiency in strategy-proof object allocation mechanisms

Randomized Assignments for Barter Exchanges: Fairness vs. Efficiency.

On the complexity of Pareto-optimal and envy-free lotteries

First-Choice Maximality Meets Ex-ante and Ex-post Fairness

Improving Efficiency of On-Campus Housing: An Experimental Study

Strategic aspects of the probabilistic serial rule for the allocation of goods

A pessimist's approach to one-sided matching

An Axiomatization of the Random Priority Rule

Fair Robust Assignment using Redundancy

Dynamic Combinatorial Assignment

Random Assignment Method Based on the Synthesis Effect

Study On Solution Models And Methods For Random Assignment Problem

Favoring Eagerness for Remaining Items: Designing Efficient, Fair, and Strategyproof Mechanisms

Randomized Strategyproof Mechanisms with Best of Both Worlds Fairness and Efficiency

Allocating with Priorities and Quotas: Algorithms, Complexity, and Dynamics

An Algorithm for the Assignment Game Beyond Additive Valuations

Online Combinatorial Assignment in Independence Systems

Random assignment method based on genetic algorithms and its application in resource allocation