Abstract:The problem of observables and their supposed lack of change has been significant in Hamiltonian quantum gravity since the 1950s. This paper considers the unrecognized variety of ideas about observables in the thought of constrained Hamiltonian dynamics co-founder Peter Bergmann, who trained many students at Syracuse and invented observables. Whereas initially Bergmann required a constrained Hamiltonian formalism to be mathematically equivalent to the Lagrangian, in 1953 Bergmann and Schiller introduced a novel postulate, motivated by facilitating quantum gravity. This postulate held that observables were invariant under transformations generated by each individual first-class constraint. While modern works rely on Bergmann's authority and sometimes speak of "Bergmann observables," he had much to say about observables, generally interesting and plausible but not all mutually consistent and much of it neglected. On occasion he required observables to be locally defined (not changeless and global); at times he wanted observables to be independent of the Hamiltonian formalism (implicitly contrary to a definition involving separate first-class constraints). But typically he took observables to have vanishing Poisson bracket with each first-class constraint and took this result to be justified by the example of electrodynamics. He expected observables to be analogous to the transverse true degrees of freedom of electromagnetism. Given these premises, there is no coherent concept of observables which he reliably endorsed, much less established. A revised definition of observables that satisfies the requirement that equivalent theories should have equivalent observables using the Rosenfeld-Anderson-Bergmann-Castellani gauge generator G, a tuned sum of first-class constraints that changes the canonical action ∫dt(pq̇-H) by a boundary term. Bootstrapping from theory formulations with no first-class constraints, one finds that the "external" coordinate gauge symmetry of GR calls for covariance (a transformation rule and hence a 4-dimensional Lie derivative for the Poisson bracket), not invariance (0 Poisson bracket), under G (not each first-class constraint separately).

Change in Hamiltonian General Relativity from the Lack of a Time-like Killing Vector Field

What Are Observables in Hamiltonian Einstein-Maxwell Theory?

Peter Bergmann on observables in Hamiltonian General Relativity: A historical-critical investigation

Hamiltonian formulation for scalar model of spontaneous spacetime symmetry violation in gravity

General Relativity, Mental Causation, and Energy Conservation

Empirical adequacy of the time operator canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian generating translations

Signed Coordinate Invariance, invariant lagrangians and manifolds, the time problem in quantum cosmology, quantum space time, spacetimes and antispacetimes

The Time in Thermal Time

Relational Mechanics as a gauge theory

Resolution of two fundamental issues in the dynamics of relativity and exposure of a real version of the emperor's new clothes

From reasonable postulates to generalised Hamiltonian systems

The Classical Equations of Motion of Quantized Gauge Theories, Part I: General Relativity

Hamiltonian Formalism for the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Physical Space–time

Time Evolution in Canonical Quantum Gravity is Trivial

A new view on cosmology, with non-translational invariant Hamiltonian

On a scalar field of time and electromagnetism

Cosmic time and the initial state of the universe

Violations of energy conservation in Horava-Lifshitz gravity: a new ingredient in the dark matter puzzle

The Hamiltonian constraint in the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity

The fate of Galilean relativity in minimal-length theories