Abstract:Background: Labral repair has become the preferred method for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears that are associated with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) resulting in pain and dysfunction. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be utilized in the primary setting for absent or calcified labra. The purpose of this study was to compare the minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and risk of revision or conversion to arthroplasty between primary labral reconstruction and primary labral repair. Methods: Patients with FAI who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair or reconstruction performed by the senior author between 2006 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively enrolled patient outcome registry. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries, dysplasia, prior ipsilateral hip surgery, or a joint space of <2 mm. Patients who were 18 to 80 years old were eligible for inclusion. Multiple regression with inverse propensity score weighting was conducted to estimate the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT) for labral reconstruction versus labral repair with respect to postoperative PROs and the likelihood of subsequent surgery (revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to arthroplasty). PRO end points included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), modified Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total score (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score (SF-12 PCS), and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 150 hips undergoing primary labral reconstruction and 998 hips undergoing primary labral repair were included. The median follow-up time was 5.3 years in the reconstruction group and 5.8 years in the repair group. Compared with labral repair, labral reconstruction was associated with a higher risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) (20% versus 7%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 8.8; p = 0.024). Inverse propensity score-weighted multiple regression estimated a significant negative effect of labral reconstruction, relative to labral repair, on the postoperative values for the HOS-ADL (ATT, -3.3; 95% CI, -5.8 to -0.7; p = 0.012) and WOMAC (ATT, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.2; p = 0.044). Conclusions: Compared with primary labral reconstruction, primary labral repair resulted in better postoperative HOS-ADL and WOMAC values and decreased conversion to THA. These findings were demonstrated in both the unadjusted group comparisons and multivariable modeling. These data support the use of labral repair in the primary setting of labral tears and the reservation of labral reconstruction for more advanced labral pathology or for revision cases. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Editorial Commentary: Indications for Acetabular Labral Debridement Versus Repair and Reconstruction: There is Still a Role for Selective Labral Debridement

Editorial Commentary: Irreparable, Symptomatic, Hip Labral Tears Should Be Reconstructed in Patients without Osteoarthritis. However, Comparison of the Two, as Well as Allograft versus Autograft Reconstruction, Is Challenging

Editorial Commentary: Surgeons Planning Hip Labral Arthroscopic Repair Should Have a Backup Plan of Labral Reconstruction or Augmentation Based on Intraoperative Labral Degeneration, Hypoplasia, or Ossification

Editorial Commentary: Primary Treatment of Hip Labral, Osseous, Chondral, Capsular, and Extra-Articular Pathology Is Essential: Outcomes Following Revision Are Less Predictable

Editorial Commentary: Small Labral Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Indication for Labral Reconstruction in the Setting of Revision Hip Arthroscopy

Editorial Commentary: Extreme Hip Labral Size (Both Small and Large) Shows Inferior Outcomes After Arthroscopic Labral Repair With Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy with Labral Preservation or Reconstruction Plus Capsular Closure Shows Excellent Outcome in Patients with Borderline Hip Dysplasia and is Less Invasive Than Periacetabular Osteotomy

Editorial Commentary: Iliotibial Band Autograft Is a Safe and Effective Technique for Hip Labral Reconstruction

Acetabular labral reconstruction using the indirect head of the rectus femoris tendon significantly improves patient reported outcomes

Editorial Commentary: Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Editorial Commentary: Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Must Be Based on Individual Patient Indications: Bridging Repair Allows Low-Tension Repair of Irreparable Tears

Acetabular "Fleck" Sign: Outcomes of Surgical Repair

Acetabular Labral Reconstruction Using Autografts Reduces Osteoarthritis Development Compared with Labral Resection in a Porcine Model.

Two-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comparative Study of Labral Repair and Labral Reconstruction

The hip fluid seal—Part II: The effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, and reconstruction on hip stability to distraction

Effect of Acetabular Labral Tear Orientation on Hip Joint Kinematics: A Comparison of Radial Tears, Chondrolabral Junction Tears and Complex Tears in Cadaveric Hips

Editorial Commentary: Meniscus Repair Technique Must Be Determined on a Tear-by-Tear Basis: Hybrid Techniques Plus Biologics Are Optimal

Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis

Editorial Commentary: Capsule Repair Is Necessary at the Conclusion of Arthroscopy to Optimize Return to Full Activity

The Everted Acetabular Labrum: Outcomes of Surgical Management