The fates of CO2 generated by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 during the dissolution of carbonate and their influences on the karst-related carbon cycle

Ruiyi Zhao,Ziqi Liu,Lili Dong,Qianzhu Zhang,Chang Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125746
IF: 6.4
2021-06-01
Journal of Hydrology
Abstract:To distinguish the two fates of CO2 generated by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 during the dissolution of carbonate rock and to reveal the effect of this CO2 on the karst-related carbon cycle at short timescales, Baishuwan Spring (BSW; overlying secondary forest) and Lanhuagou Spring (LHG; overlying farmland) were monitored monthly by measurement of major elements and the stable carbon isotope of dissolved inorganic carbon (δ13CDIC) in spring water. The average net CO2 consumption, CO2 consumption by H2CO3, and CO2 emission by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 were 2.43, 2.65, and 0.23 mmol/L at BSW, whereas they were 1.07, 2.27, and 1.2 mmol/L at LHG, respectively. The low CO2 consumption by H2CO3 and the high CO2 emission by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 collectively led to a lower net CO2 consumption at LHG than at BSW; the effect of CO2 emissions was greater than the effect of CO2 consumption. The fates of the CO2 generated by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 were quantified. On average, 35.26% of this CO2 escaped from the water at BSW, whereas 82.82% escaped from the water at LHG, presumably due to different water-rock reaction times. Changes in the fate of CO2 may influence emissions and the karst-related carbon cycle.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources,engineering, civil
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the different fates of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced during the dissolution of carbonate rocks by sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and/or nitric acid (HNO3), and to reveal the impact of these CO2 on karst-related carbon cycling. Specifically, the paper quantifies the two different fates of CO2 by monitoring two karst springs with different land use types—Baishuibai Spring (BSW) and Lanhua Gou Spring (LHG): 1. **Fate of CO2**: - The paper distinguishes between two fates of CO2 produced by the dissolution of carbonate rocks by H2SO4 and/or HNO3: one is the direct escape from the water; the other is further participation in karst processes and entering the groundwater body in the form of HCO3−. 2. **Impact Mechanism**: - The paper studies the short-term impact of these two CO2 fates on karst-related carbon cycling. Specifically, the study found that in BSW Spring, an average of about 35.26% of CO2 escapes from the water; while in LHG Spring, this proportion is as high as 82.82%. This indicates that different water-rock reaction times lead to changes in the fate of CO2, thereby affecting CO2 emissions and karst-related carbon cycling. 3. **Experimental Design and Results**: - The study quantifies the net consumption of CO2, the CO2 consumed by H2CO3, and the CO2 emissions produced by H2SO4 and/or HNO3 by measuring the major elements in the spring water and the stable carbon isotopes of dissolved inorganic carbon (δ13CDIC). The results show that in BSW Spring, the average net CO2 consumption is 2.43 mmol/L, while in LHG Spring it is 1.07 mmol/L. Through these studies, the paper aims to better understand the carbon cycling processes in karst areas and provide a scientific basis for estimating karst-related carbon fluxes.