Cosmology at at Crossroads: Tension with the Hubble Constant

Wendy L. Freedman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.02739

2017-06-08

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract:We are at an interesting juncture in cosmology. With new methods and technology, the accuracy in measurement of the Hubble constant has vastly improved, but a recent tension has arisen that is either signaling new physics or as-yet unrecognized uncertainties.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Unsettled Number: Hubble's Tension

Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota,Salvador Galindo-Uribarri,George F. Smoot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9120501

2023-12-27

Abstract:One of main sources of uncertainty in modern cosmology is the present rate of the universe's expansion, H0, called the Hubble constant. Once again, different observational techniques bring about different results, causing new 'Hubble tension'. In the present work, we review the historical roots of the Hubble constant from the beginning of the twentieth century, when modern cosmology originated, to the present. We develop the arguments that gave rise to the importance of measuring the expansion of the Universe and its discovery, and we describe the different pioneering works attempting to measure it. There has been a long dispute on this matter, even in the present epoch, which is marked by high-tech instrumentation and, therefore, in smaller uncertainties in the relevant parameters. It is, again, currently necessary to conduct a careful and critical revision of the different methods before one invokes new physics to solve the so-called Hubble tension.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension

Eleonora Di Valentino,Luis A. Anchordoqui,Yacine Ali-Haimoud,Luca Amendola,Nikki Arendse,Marika Asgari,Mario Ballardini,Elia Battistelli,Micol Benetti,Simon Birrer,Marco Bruni,Erminia Calabrese,David Camarena,Salvatore Capozziello,Angela Chen,Jens Chluba,Anton Chudaykin,Eoin Ó Colgáin,Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,Paolo de Bernardis,Jacques Delabrouille,Jo Dunkley,Agnès Ferté,Fabio Finelli,Wendy Freedman,Noemi Frusciante,Elena Giusarma,Adrià Gómez-Valent,Will Handley,Luke Hart,Alan Heavens,Hendrik Hildebrandt,Daniel Holz,Dragan Huterer,Mikhail M. Ivanov,Shahab Joudaki,Marc Kamionkowski,Tanvi Karwal,Lloyd Knox,Luca Lamagna,Julien Lesgourgues,Matteo Lucca,Valerio Marra,Silvia Masi,Sabino Matarrese,Alessandro Melchiorri,Olga Mena,Laura Mersini-Houghton,Vivian Miranda,David F. Mota,Jessica Muir,Ankan Mukherjee,Florian Niedermann,Alessio Notari,Rafael C. Nunes,Francesco Pace,Antonella Palmese,Supriya Pan,Daniela Paoletti,Valeria Pettorino,Francesco Piacentini,Vivian Poulin,Marco Raveri,Adam G. Riess,Vincenzo Salzano,Emmanuel N. Saridakis,Anjan A. Sen,Arman Shafieloo,Anowar J. Shajib,Joseph Silk,Alessandra Silvestri,Martin S. Sloth,Tristan L. Smith,Carsten van de Bruck,Licia Verde,Luca Visinelli,Benjamin D. Wandelt,Weiqiang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605

2020-01-01

Abstract: The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard $\Lambda$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, that has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in portion the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the $4.4\sigma$ tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting new physics models that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade experiments will be crucial.
Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective

Wendy L. Freedman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e95

2021-06-30

Abstract:Measurement of the distances to nearby galaxies have improved rapidly in recent decades. The ever-present challenge is to reduce systematic effects, especially as greater distances are probed, and the uncertainties become larger. In this paper, we combine several recent calibrations of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) method. These calibrations are internally self-consistent at the 1% level. New Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) data provide an additional consistency check, at a (lower) 5% level of accuracy, a result of the well-documented Gaia angular covariance bias. The updated TRGB calibration applied to a distant sample of Type Ia supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project results in a value of the Hubble constant of Ho = 69.8 $\pm$ 0.6 (stat) $\pm$ 1.6 (sys) km/s/Mpc. No statistically significant difference is found between the value of Ho based on the TRGB and that determined from measurements of the cosmic microwave background. The TRGB results are also consistent to within 2$\sigma$ with the SHoES and Spitzer plus HST Key Project Cepheid calibrations. The TRGB results alone do not demand additional new physics beyond the standard Lambda-CDM cosmological model. They have the advantage of simplicity of the underlying physics (the core He flash) and small systematic uncertainties (from extinction, metallicity and crowding). Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of both the TRGB and Cepheids are reviewed, and prospects for addressing the current discrepancy with future Gaia, HST and JWST observations are discussed. Resolving this discrepancy is essential for ascertaining if the claimed tension in Ho between the locally-measured and the CMB-inferred value is physically motivated.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology,High Energy Physics - Theory
Progress in Direct Measurements of the Hubble Constant

Wendy L. Freedman,Barry F. Madore

2023-09-18

Abstract:One of the most exciting and pressing issues in cosmology today is the discrepancy between some measurements of the local Hubble constant and other values of the expansion rate inferred from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. Resolving these differences holds the potential for the discovery of new physics beyond the standard model of cosmology: Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM), a successful model that has been in place for more than 20 years. Given both the fundamental significance of this outstanding discrepancy, and the many-decades-long effort to increase the accuracy of the extragalactic distance scale, it is critical to demonstrate that the local measurements are convincingly free from residual systematic errors. We review the progress over the past quarter century in measurements of the local value of the Hubble constant, and discuss remaining challenges. Particularly exciting are new data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). JWST is delivering high-resolution near-infrared imaging data to both test for and to address directly several of the systematic uncertainties that have historically limited the accuracy of the extragalactic distance scale. We present an overview of our new JWST program to observe Cepheids, TRGB and JAGB stars. For the first galaxy in our program, NGC 7250, the high-resolution JWST images demonstrate that many of the Cepheids observed with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) are significantly crowded by nearby neighbors. Avoiding the more significantly crowded variables, the scatter in the JWST near-infrared (NIR) Cepheid period-luminosity relation is decreased by a factor of two compared to those from HST, illustrating the power of JWST for improvements to local measurements of Ho. Ultimately, these data will either confirm the standard model, or provide robust evidence for the inclusion of additional new physics.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

Marc Kamionkowski,Adam G. Riess

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107

2023-08-24

Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science

Abstract:Over the past decade, the disparity between the value of the cosmic expansion rate determined directly from measurements of distance and redshift and that determined instead from the standard Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model, calibrated by measurements from the early Universe, has grown to a level of significance requiring a solution. Proposed systematic errors are not supported by the breadth of available data (and unknown errors untestable by lack of definition). Simple theoretical explanations for this Hubble tension that are consistent with the majority of the data have been surprisingly hard to come by, but in recent years, attention has focused increasingly on models that alter the early or pre-recombination physics of ΛCDM as the most feasible. Here, we describe the nature of this tension and emphasize recent developments on the observational side. We then explain why early-Universe solutions are currently favored and the constraints that any such model must satisfy. We discuss one workable example, early dark energy, and describe how it can be tested with future measurements. Given an assortment of more extended recent reviews on specific aspects of the problem, the discussion is intended to be fairly general and understandable to a broad audience. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, Volume 73 is September 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

physics, particles & fields, nuclear
Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

Jian-Ping Hu,Fa-Yin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020094

IF: 2.8128

2023-02-10

Universe

Abstract:The ΛCDM model provides a good fit to most astronomical observations but harbors large areas of phenomenology and ignorance. With the improvements in the precision and number of observations, discrepancies between key cosmological parameters of this model have emerged. Among them, the most notable tension is the 4σ to 6σ deviation between the Hubble constant (H0) estimations measured by the local distance ladder and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement. In this review, we revisit the H0 tension based on the latest research and sort out evidence from solutions to this tension that might imply new physics beyond the ΛCDM model. The evidence leans more towards modifying the late-time universe.

astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields
Exploring the Hubble Tension: A Novel Approach through Cosmological Observations

Darshan Kumar,Debajyoti Choudhury,Debottam Nandi

2023-10-05

Abstract:The simplest cosmological model ($\Lambda$CDM) is well-known to suffer from the Hubble tension, namely an almost $5 \sigma$ discrepancy between the (model-based) early-time determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and its late-time (and model-independent) determination. To circumvent this, we introduce an additional energy source that varies with the redshift as $(1 + z)^n$, where $0 < n < 3$, and test it against the Pantheon Compilation of Type Ia Supernovae as well as the CMBR observations (at $z \approx 1100$). The deduced $H_0$ is now well-consistent with the value obtained from local observations of Cepheid variables. Suggesting a non-zero value for the curvature density parameter, positive (negative) for $n > 2$ ($n < 2$), the resolution is also consistent with the BAO data.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
A Critical Discussion on the H0 Tension

Salvatore Capozziello,Giuseppe Sarracino,Giulia De Somma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10030140

IF: 2.8128

2024-03-13

Universe

Abstract:A critical discussion on the H0 Hubble constant tension is presented by considering both early and late-type observations. From recent precise measurements, discrepancies emerge when comparing results for some cosmological quantities obtained at different redshifts. We highlight the most relevant measurements of H0 and propose potential ideas to solve its tension. These solutions concern the exploration of new physics beyond the ΛCDM model or the evaluation of H0 by other methods. In particular, we focus on the role of the look-back time.

astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields
Solving the Hubble tension à la Ellis & Stoeger 1987

Jenny Wagner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/1.436.0267

2023-11-11

Abstract:The discrepancy between the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ in the late, local universe and the one obtained from the Planck collaboration representing an all-sky value for the early universe reached the 5-$\sigma$ level. Approaches to alleviate the tension contain a wide range of ansatzes: increasing uncertainties in data acquisition, reducing biases in the astrophysical models that underly the probes, or taking into account observer-dependent variances in the parameters of the cosmological background model. Yet, early and late universe probes are often treated as independent, they live on different length scales, and require different perturbations to be subtracted. Hence, fitting a flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker cosmology to different probes at different cosmic epochs can yield different sets of cosmological parameter values. Tensions arise if these background fits and perturbing biases are not consistently calibrated or synchronised with respect to each other. This consistent model-fitting calibration is lacking between the two $H_0$ values mentioned above, thus causing a tension. As shown here, this interpretation resolves the $H_0$tension, if 15% of the matter-density parameter obtained from the fit to the cosmic microwave background, $\Omega_m = 0.315$, are assigned to decoupled perturbations yielding $\Omega_m = 0.267$ for the fit at redshifts of the supernova observations. Existing theoretical analyses and data evaluations which support this solution are given.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
The Hubble Constant: A Historical Review

R. Brent Tully

2023-05-20

Abstract:For 100 years since galaxies were found to be flying apart from each other, astronomers have been trying to determine how fast. The expansion, characterized by the Hubble constant, H0, is confused locally by peculiar velocities caused by gravitational interactions, so observers must obtain accurate distances at significant redshifts. Very nearby in our Galaxy, accurate distances can be determined through stellar parallaxes. There is no good method for obtaining galaxy distances that is applicable from the near domain of stellar parallaxes to the far domain free from velocity anomalies. The recourse is the distance ladder involving multiple methods with overlapping domains. Good progress is being made on this project, with satisfactory procedures and linkages identified and tested across the necessary distance range. Best values of H0 from the distance ladder lie in the range 73 - 75 km/s/Mpc. On the other hand, from detailed information available from the power spectrum of fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background, coupled with constraints favoring the existence of dark energy from distant supernova measurements, there is the precise prediction that H0 = 67.4 to 1%. If it is conclusively determined that the Hubble constant is well above 70 km/s/Mpc as indicated by distance ladder results then the current preferred LambdaCDM cosmological model based on the Standard Model of particle physics may be incomplete. There is reason for optimism that the value of the Hubble constant from distance ladder observations will be rigorously defined with 1% accuracy in the near future.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Tensions in cosmology: a discussion of statistical tools to determine inconsistencies

Matías Leizerovich,Susana J. Landau,Claudia G. Scóccola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138844

2024-07-16

Abstract:We present a comprehensive analysis of statistical tools for evaluating tensions in cosmological parameter estimates arising from distinct datasets. Focusing on the unresolved Hubble constant ($H_0$) tension, we explore the Pantheon Plus + SH0ES (PPS) compilation, which includes low-redshift Cepheid data from the SH0ES collaboration, along with the latest release of CMB data from the Planck collaboration, Cosmic Chronometers (CC) dataset and the most recent Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) datasets. Employing various tension metrics, we quantitatively assess the inconsistencies in parameter estimates, emphasizing the importance of capturing multidimensional tensions. Our results reveal substantial tension between PPS and Planck 2018 datasets and moderate tension between the BAO data sets and all other datasets. We highlight the importance of adopting these metrics to enhance the precision of future cosmological analyses and facilitate the resolution of existing tensions.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
A critical discussion on the $H_0$ tension

Salvatore Capozziello,Giuseppe Sarracino,Giulia De Somma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10030140

2024-03-13

Abstract:A critical discussion on the $H_0$ Hubble constant tension is presented by considering both early and late-type observations. From recent precise measurements, discrepancies emerge when comparing results for some cosmological quantities obtained at different redshifts. We highlight the most relevant measurements of $H_0$ and propose potential ideas to solve its tension. These solutions concern the exploration of new physics beyond the $\Lambda$CDM model or the evaluation of $H_0$ by other methods. In particular, we focus on the role of the look-back time.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Theory
Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy

Isaac Tutusaus,Martin Kunz,Léo Favre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.16862

2023-11-28

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract:The current expansion rate of the Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$, is an important cosmological quantity. However, two different ways to measure its value do not agree -- building a low-redshift distance ladder leads to a higher value of $H_0$ than inferring it from high-redshift observations in a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Most approaches to solve this tension either act at very low redshift by modifying the local distance ladder, or at high redshift by introducing new physics that changes the normalization of the inverse distance ladder. Here we discuss a way to address the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts instead. By keeping the low- and high-redshift normalizations unchanged, we find a violation of the distance duality in the redshift range where luminosity and angular diameter distances overlap. We 'solve' this problem by introducing a redshift-dependent systematic effect that brings the luminosity distance into agreement with the angular diameter distance. The resulting expansion history is no longer compatible with $\Lambda$CDM, but this can be fixed with a dynamical dark energy component. In this way, we are able to solve the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts.
A tale of two double quasars: Hubble constant tension or biases?

Luis J. Goicoechea,Vyacheslav N. Shalyapin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.01271

2022-01-04

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract:For a flat $\Lambda$CDM (standard) cosmology, a small sample of gravitationally lensed quasars with measured time delays has recently provided a value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ in tension with the $Planck$ flat $\Lambda$CDM result. Trying to check if this tension is real or not, we used basic observational constraints for two double quasars of the GLENDAMA sample (SBS 0909+532 and SDSS J1339+1310) to discuss the underlying value of $H_0$ in a standard cosmology. For SBS 0909+532, we were not able to obtain a reliable measurement of $H_0$. However, the current data of SDSS J1339+1310 are consistent with $H_0$ around 67.8 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ and $\sigma (H_0)/H_0 \sim$ 10%. Although the formal uncertainty is still large and mainly due to the lack of details on the mass density profile of the main lens galaxy, the central value of $H_0$ coincides with that of the TDCOSMO+SLACS collaboration (using gravitational lens systems) and is within the 1$\sigma$ interval from $Planck$ cosmic microwave background data. After getting these preliminary encouraging results through only one double quasar, we are currently planning to use several GLENDAMA systems to accurately measure the Hubble constant and put constraints on other cosmological parameters.
Addressing the Hubble tension with cosmic chronometers

Michele Moresco

2023-10-13

Abstract:Twenty years after the discovery that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, a new finding is now challenging our understanding of the cosmos. Recent studies have shown that the Hubble constant, the speed of expansion measured today, provides values in significant tension when measured from the Cosmic Microwave Background in the primordial Universe or from Cepheids and Supernovae Type Ia in the local Universe. Whether this tension is hinting towards new physics or some issue in the measurements, is still under debate; but it is clearly calling for new independent cosmological probes to provide additional pieces of evidence to solve this puzzle. This chapter introduces the method of cosmic chronometers, a new emerging cosmological probe that can provide cosmology-independent estimates of the Universe's expansion history. This method is based on the fact that the expansion rate of the Universe can be directly derived from measuring how much the Universe has changed in age between two different redshifts, i.e. by estimating the slope of the age--redshift relation. First, the main ingredients of the method will be discussed, presenting the main equations involved and how to estimate from the observables the needed quantities. After, it will be presented how to reliably select a sample of tracers to map the age evolution of the Universe coherently. Next, different methods to robustly measure the differential age of a population, the fundamental quantity involved in the method, will be reviewed. Finally, the main measurements obtained will be presented, providing forecasts for future surveys and discussing how these data can provide useful feedback to address the Hubble tension.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Hubble tension and gravitational self-interaction

Corey Sargent,William Jackson Clark,Alexandre Deur,Balsa Terzic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad570f

2024-06-14

Physica Scripta

Abstract:One of the most important problems vexing the ΛCDM cosmological model is the Hubble tension. It arises from the fact that measurements of the present value of the Hubble parameter performed with low-redshift quantities, e.g., the Type IA supernova, tend to yield larger values than measurements from quantities originating at high-redshift, e.g., fits of cosmic microwave background radiation. It is becoming likely that the discrepancy, currently standing at 5σ, is not due to systematic errors in the measurements. Here we explore whether the self-interaction of gravitational fields in General Relativity, which are traditionally neglected when studying the evolution of the universe, can contribute to explaining the tension. We find that with field self-interaction accounted for, both low- and high-redshift data are simultaneously well-fitted, thereby showing that gravitational self-interaction yield consistent H 0 values when inferred from SnIA and cosmic microwave background observations. Crucially, this is achieved without introducing additional parameters.

physics, multidisciplinary
A bias using the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects to address the Hubble tension

André A. Costa,Zelin Ren,Zhixiang Yin

2023-09-18

Abstract:Recently different cosmological measurements have shown a tension in the value of the Hubble constant, $H_0$. Assuming the $\Lambda$CDM model, the Planck satellite mission has inferred the Hubble constant from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies to be $H_0 = 67.4 \pm 0.5 \, \rm{km \, s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}}$. On the other hand, low redshift measurements such as those using Cepheid variables and supernovae Type Ia (SNIa) have obtained a significantly larger value. For instance, Riess et al. reported $H_0 = 73.04 \pm 1.04 \, \rm{km \, s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}}$, which is $5\sigma$ apart of the prediction from Planck observations. This tension is a major problem in cosmology nowadays, and it is not clear yet if it comes from systematic effects or new physics. The use of new methods to infer the Hubble constant is therefore essential to shed light on this matter. In this paper, we discuss using the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects (OAO) to probe the Hubble tension. We show that, although this data can provide additional information, the method can also artificially introduce a tension. Reanalyzing the ages of 114 OAO, we obtain that the constraint in the Hubble constant goes from slightly disfavoring local measurements to favoring them.

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter

V. G. Gurzadyan,A. Stepanian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141736

2021-09-01

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract:It is shown, from the two independent approaches of McCrea-Milne and of Zeldovich, that one can fully recover the set equations corresponding to the relativistic equations of the expanding universe of Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker geometry. Although similar, the Newtonian and relativistic set of equations have a principal difference in the content and hence define two flows, local and global ones, thus naturally exposing the Hubble tension at the presence of the cosmological constant Λ. From this, we obtain absolute constraints on the lower and upper values for the local Hubble parameter, √(Λc 2 /3) ≃ 56.2 and √(Λc 2 ) ≃ 97.3 (km s −1 Mpc −1 ), respectively. The link to the so-called maximum force–tension issue in cosmological models is revealed.

astronomy & astrophysics
Does Hubble tension signal a breakdown in FLRW cosmology?

C Krishnan,R Mohayaee,E Ó Colgáin,M M Sheikh-Jabbari,L Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac1a81

IF: 3.5

2021-08-23

Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract:The tension between early and late Universe probes of the Hubble constant has motivated various new FLRW cosmologies. Here, we reanalyse the Hubble tension with a recent age of the Universe constraint. This allows us to restrict attention to matter and a dark energy sector that we treat without assuming a specific model. Assuming analyticity of the Hubble parameter H(z), and a generic low redshift modification to flat ΛCDM, we find that low redshift data (z ≲ 2.5) and well-motivated priors only permit a dark energy sector close to the cosmological constant Λ. This restriction rules out late Universe modifications within FLRW. We show that early Universe physics that alters the sound horizon can yield an upper limit of H0 ∼ 71 ± 1 km s−1 Mpc−1. Since various local determinations may be converging to H0 ∼ 73 km s−1 Mpc−1, a breakdown of the FLRW framework is a plausible resolution. We outline how future data, in particular strongly lensed quasar data, could also provide further confirmations of such a resolution.

astronomy & astrophysics,physics, multidisciplinary, particles & fields,quantum science & technology

Cosmology at at Crossroads: Tension with the Hubble Constant

The Unsettled Number: Hubble's Tension

Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension

Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective

Progress in Direct Measurements of the Hubble Constant

The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

Exploring the Hubble Tension: A Novel Approach through Cosmological Observations

A Critical Discussion on the H0 Tension

Solving the Hubble tension à la Ellis & Stoeger 1987

The Hubble Constant: A Historical Review

Tensions in cosmology: a discussion of statistical tools to determine inconsistencies

A critical discussion on the $H_0$ tension

Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy

A tale of two double quasars: Hubble constant tension or biases?

Addressing the Hubble tension with cosmic chronometers

Hubble tension and gravitational self-interaction

A bias using the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects to address the Hubble tension

Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter

Does Hubble tension signal a breakdown in FLRW cosmology?