Submental Intubation in Maxillofacial Procedures: A More Desired Approach Than Nasotracheal Intubation and Tracheostomy
Kerry-Ann D. Williams,Maha Tariq,Maitri V. Acharekar,Sara Elena Guerrero Saldivia,Sumedha Unnikrishnan,Yeny Y. Chavarria,Adebisi O. Akindele,Ana P. Jalkh,Aziza K. Eastmond,Chaitra Shetty,Syed Muhammad Hannan Ali Rizvi,Joudi Sharaf,Lubna Mohammed,Sumedha N. Unnikrishnan,Yeny Chavarria,Ana Paula C. Jalkh,Kerry-Ann D Williams,Maitri V Acharekar,Yeny Y Chavarria,Adebisi O Akindele,Ana P Jalkh,Aziza K Eastmond
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27475
2022-07-30
Cureus
Abstract:To achieve adequate airway management in maxillofacial procedures, the right intubation technique should be employed. This is because the surgeons and the anesthesiologists will need to work in the same surgical field to ensure a successful procedure. The type of intubation method used can either complicate either's role or pose some difficulties in the surgery itself. Nasotracheal intubation and orotracheal intubation may often be contraindicated in different types of maxillofacial surgeries and due to the complications associated with a tracheostomy, this method is often utilized as a last resort. Submental intubation has become very popular and favored alternative and has been associated with fewer complications. This literature review was conducted to explore the indications, complications, and contraindications of the different intubation methods. Sources were gathered from PubMed Central, PubMed, and Google scholar and included articles published between 2012 and 2022. A mix of literature reviews, case base studies, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and a few systematic reviews were examined. It was found that the use of submental intubation was preferred due to its less invasive nature, minimal intraoperatively and postoperatively complications, and greater patient compliance compared to tracheostomy. In addition, it is the best method when Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated.
English Else