Abstract:BackgroundSerological allergy tests measuring allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) are simpler and safer than skin prick tests, and the results are not influenced by skin condition or human factors. Quantitative detection of sIgE can also aid in evaluating patient allergies and aiding subsequent treatment. Dymind has researched and developed novel quantitative allergy tests based on the automated flow fluorescence immunoassay analyzer system (MF1280), enabling quantitative detection of multiple sIgE in just one test with one sample. Here, we present the performance of tIgE and two specific IgE test kits using the Dymind MF1280 system.MethodsThis study evaluated the performance of total IgE (tIgE) and two allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) panels of inhalant and food allergens, inhalant allergen panel including d1 (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), d2 (Dermatophagoides farina), i6 (Cockroach), e1 (Cat epithelium), e5 (Dog epithelium), w1(Common ragweed), and food allergen panel including f1 (Egg white), f2 (Cow's milk), f3 (cod), f23 (Crab), 24 (Shrimp), and f27 (beef). Evaluation criteria included precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and method comparison. As clinical performance of 425 clinical samples collected from 2 hospital laboratory in China was evaluated by both of Dymind allergen IgE MF1280 system and Phadia ImmunoCAP.ResultsThe validated linearity of total IgE and sIgE were 2.0-5000.0 IU/mL and 0.1-100.0 IU/mL respectively. The LOD of total IgE and sIgE determined to be 2 IU/mL and 0.1 IU/mL respectively. The precision was evaluated by assaying a low and a high samples of every sIgE assay and the result of d1, d2, i6, e1, e5, w1, f1, f2, f3, f23, f24, f27 were 3.73% / 1.34% (low sample / high sample), 3.26% / 1.95%, 2.18% / 0.87%, 1.31% / 1.40%, 3.63% / 1.13%, 2.84% / 4.76%, 4.50% / 1.53%, 5.97% / 1.64%, 3.46% / 1.11%, 1.58% / 1.73%, 3.77% / 1.28%, 1.78% / 0.96% respectively. The total mean coefficient of measurements was below 7% to ensure high precision in multiplex quantitative analysis. Method comparison of 425 clinical samples between Phadia ImmunoCAP and Dymind allergen IgE showed total concordance rate was over 85% except f2 (over 80%).ConclusionsThe Dymind Allergen-specific IgE test kits on the automated flow fluorescence immunoassay analyzer system provide fast and accurate in vitro diagnostic detection of tIgE and sIgE for aiding diagnostics specific allergens sensitization and treatment for allergy patients, with good precision and excellent agreement compared to ImmunoCAP. The MF1280 system has advantages including random access, fully automated, multiplex quantitative detection of allergen sIgE with reducing assay time, sample consumption and lower costs.

NOVEOSTM and ImmunoCAPTM have similar performances for diagnosing food allergies.

B-056 Clinical and Analytical Performance Evaluation of Two Immunoassays for the Detection of Mite Specific Serum IgE for Allergy Diagnosis

Peanut allergy diagnosis in the context of grass pollen sensitization for 125 patients: roles of peanut and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants specific IgE

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of allergen component-specific to birch and grass analyzed by ImmunoCAP assay and Euroline immunoblot test

ImmunoCAP ISAC in food allergy diagnosis: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy

Alternative to In Vivo Tests During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Allergen Simultaneous Tests as a Useful First Screening

Atopic Status in Children with Asthma and Respiratory Allergies—Comparative Analysis of Total IgE, ImmunoCAP Phadiatop/fx5 and Euroimmun Pediatric Immunoblot

Evaluation of the clinical performance of multiple serum sIgE detection systems based on component-resolved diagnosis

B-059 Development and Validation of Multiplex Quantitative Allergy Tests based on Automated Flow Fluorescence Immunoassay Analyzer

Performance comparison between Phadiatop and Sx01 multi-allergen tests for airborne allergy diagnosis

Serologic Measurements for Peanut Allergy: Predicting Clinical Severity is Complex

Clinical utility analysis of the Hoxb8 mast cell activation test for the diagnosis of peanut allergy

Homemade Food Allergen Extracts for Use in Skin Prick Tests in the Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: A Good Alternative in the Absence of Commercially Available Extracts?

The Natural History of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: Can Skin Prick Tests and Serum-Specific IgE Predict the Resolution of Food Allergy?

Food allergy severity predictions based on cellular in vitro tests

Variable IgE cross‐reactivity between peanut 2S‐albumins: The case for measuring IgE to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6

Multiplex Assays in Allergy Diagnosis: Allergy Explorer 2 versus ImmunoCAP ISAC E112i

Immunological Outcomes of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Food Allergy

Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with fresh foods and commercial food extracts) and RAST in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome

Comparison of allergen quantification strategies for egg, milk, and peanut in food using targeted LC-MS/MS

The diagnostic accuracy of specific IgE to Ara h 6 in adults is as good as Ara h 2